[tei-council] Conformance draft: namespace purity

[Lou Burnard]

That was certainly a minority view which has been expressed. And 
certainly the material on the interchange format (formerly IN, now 24.2) 
is in need of substantial revision. Maybe a good way forward would be to 
see how far we can get with that first? Certainly the two are closely 
related!


Syd Bauman wrote:
>> Over the last week, Dan, Dot, Arianna, Conal, Sebastian and I have
>> all expressed support for James's proposal that (inter alia)
>> conformance in a TEI document implies that the TEI namespace
>> remains unpolluted by user-defined elements.
>>     
>
> I had thought that perhaps James (and someone else?) now believed
> that namespace-purity be in the realm of the definition of "TEI
> Interchange Format", rather than of "TEI Conformance". I certainly
> do.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
>