[tei-council] Re: schema association

[Sebastian Rahtz]

Syd Bauman wrote:
>> that's fine, and it takes it out of our timeline. we would
>> participate as an interested party, but would not have a dependency
>> on it for P5.
>>     
>
> This is not what I had in mind at all. I think we should try, very
> hard, to get this done such that it is included in P5 1.0. 
>   
I hope that my request yesterday for the council to
vote on this subject will deal with the issue one way
or another? Note that I have only had one response.....

Sebastian