[tei-council] what to do with dating attributes -- VOTE!

[Sebastian Rahtz]

>
> Issue: name of main dating attr (date= vs value=)
> Solution: leave 'em as is
> Vote:
>
>      X I have considered issue, and agree with proposed solution
>   

> Issue: classes -- @dur and @value in same or different attr classes?
> Solution: split 'em into separate classes
> Vote:
>
>      X I have considered issue, and agree with proposed solution
>   

> Issue: keep <distance>?
> Solution: nuke it
> Vote:
>
>      X I have considered issue, and agree with proposed solution
>   

> Issue: keep precision= of <date>
> Solution: nuke it
> Vote:
>
>      X I have considered issue, and agree with proposed solution
>
>
>   

> Issue: method of expressing known day & month, unknown year, or
>        specific possible dates within a range
> Suggestion: defer to P5 1.x.
> Vote:
>
>      X I have considered issue, and agree with proposed solution
>   

>          I have considered issue, and agree with proposed solution:
>      ___ A
>      ___ B
>      X   C
>      ___ D
>   


-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      

Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk