[tei-council] time & date model classes: lump 'em?

[Arianna Ciula]

Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> Syd Bauman wrote:
>> Sorry folks, but I have mislead you. It's not just <recording> that
>> uses model.dateLike but not model.timeLike, but also <imprint>,
>> <persEvent>, <persState>, <persTrait>, and <biblItem>. Are we still
>> in favor of lumping?
>>   
> hard to see why not. If you imagine using <imprint> or
> <biblItem> for podcasts, time might be needed.
> 

True, same may be valid for <persEvent>, may be less so for <persState> 
and <persTrait>, but it wouldn't be conceptually wrong anyway, just less 
likely. So I would say lump as well.

Arianna
-- 
Dr Arianna Ciula
Research Associate
Centre for Computing in the Humanities
King's College London
Strand
London WC2R 2LS (UK)
Tel: +44 (0)20 78481945
http://www.kcl.ac.uk/cch