[tei-council] content model of body etc

[Lou Burnard]

Sorry, I answered Senbastian's note before seeing this. Naturally, I am 
perfectly happy to wait for you to resolve your vague suspicions. Any 
particular Thursday?

Syd Bauman wrote:
>>Does anyone care to discuss this further? 
> 
> 
> Yes, I do. I won't get to it today, but will take a careful look Wed
> hopefully post by Thu. At first glance missing a few model.glabals,
> and has an extra nesting level, but looks good. (Have you tested it w
> non-DIV removals? I remember being vaguely suspicious that removing
> macro.component would cause non-determinism, but I can't remember
> why and I got too embroiled in dates to test it myself.)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> 
>