[tei-council] open issues and planning
Lou Burnard
lou.burnard at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk
Mon Jan 22 12:30:03 EST 2007
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> Syd Bauman wrote:
>> I probably missed something, then. I thought we were quite careful
>> at the MM in Victoria *not* to make a full-fledged commitment to
>> have P5 done by College Park.
> Memories obviously vary. I thought we made an absolute
> commitment to do this!
Me too.
>> Taiwan or not, I thought it was deliberate. Besides, Lou has
>> suggested, and I think he's right, that an additional face-to-face
>> meeting over chapter review is probably a good idea. That may (or
>> may not) make it quite difficult to be done with 1.0 by MM2007.
>>
> why can't we have another f2f before November?
I suggested a FTF meeting to review the state of chapters before
publication, yes. It could be any time before November.
In my opinion, the priorities are (still)
- triage of outstanding SF feature requests
- chapter review
The specific items Syd mentions are all things that could be resolved
quite quickly, I think, once we accept that it's more important to have
a finished product than a perfect one.
More information about the tei-council
mailing list