[tei-council] Agenda item?

Lou Burnard lou.burnard at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk
Wed Jan 17 13:52:17 EST 2007


Dan O'Donnell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have a topic that I hesitantly mention: tei:choice. My own conviction
> is that we have too narrow a content model for the element. But I
> understand that it may be too late to revisit the question?
> 
> I've been asking around to find a consensus on when an element of P5 has
> been "decided" and only minor modifications are considered possible, but
> we apparently don't have one.

I seem to have missed out on this "asking around": were you seeking 
Council's opinion on the procedural issue of when/how element 
definitions get fixed, or on the specific technical issue of whether the 
current proposal for the content model of <choice> needs attention?

> 
> If anybody thinks this is worth discussing at this telco or the next, I
> can prepare something.
> 

On which topic?


> -dan




More information about the tei-council mailing list