[tei-council] date-stamping <desc>
lou.burnard at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk
Wed Oct 11 05:11:32 EDT 2006
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> James Cummings wrote:
>> Is there anything
>> stopping us having multiple desc elements for the original language,
>> and then
>> only displaying the one with the highest version number?
> the logic which works out which <desc> to display
> at any given time could be adjusted cope with this,
> yes, and the markup would be legal.
> But I do think you're getting the problem out
> of proportion. We're just not getting these constant
> revisions and translations...
So what's the resolution? <desc> gets a @version attribute? the value of
which is likely to look like a canonical date but need not?
What about <exemplum>s?
More information about the tei-council