[tei-council] DRAFT: Backward Compatibility and the Maintenance of the Text Encoding Initiative Guidelines

Sebastian Rahtz sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Mon Oct 9 12:16:31 EDT 2006

Syd Bauman wrote:
> Did you mean Board? While I have no objection to soliciting the
> Board's opinion (or the membership's, for that matter), this seems to
> me to be completely within the scope of the Council, and outside the
> scope of the Board. I.e., it's the Council's decision, although
> seeking outside advise is probably a good idea.
I did mean Board. It seems worthwhile that
statements of principle be agreed by the Board too.
>> I think the bit that bothers me a little is the notion of
>> deprecation. Where, and how, would that be recorded?
> I don't think such details need keep us from agreeing on the
> principle of the matter.
indeed. so long we accept the notion of deprecating things,
which is a new departure for the TEI

Sebastian Rahtz      

Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service

More information about the tei-council mailing list