[tei-council] New discussion document on 1.0 release priorities

[Sebastian Rahtz]

James Cummings wrote:
>
> While that is a nice useful feature, I think the 'right' way to indicate an
> invalid schema is at time of generation.  User generates schema, schema is
> validated (somehow) and user is presented with a list of the errors. 
there's a big issue there with issuing an error report
which is of any use. just giving them the output from
trang may make them very frustrated...
> Is there any way other than element dependency to have Roma make an invalid
> schema?  Lack of start element? What else?
>   
the punter has control over all the content models.
if they fool with them, all bets are off.

lack of start element does not make a schema invalid, BTW

-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      

Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk