[tei-council] New discussion document on 1.0 release priorities
sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Wed Jul 19 18:44:21 EDT 2006
Christian Wittern wrote:
> * While I am undecided on whether we need a module dependency, I think
> we need to avoid producing invalid schemata whenever feasible. This
> includes detecting of (accidental?) deletion of essential elements.
> My students here got a schema from Roma yesterday that happily
> indicated TEI as the start element, although the element TEI was
> deleted (together with the complete textstructure module).
There is a law of diminishing returns here, I think. Catering
for accidental deletion of <TEI> may be going too far.....
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service
More information about the tei-council