[tei-council] New discussion document on 1.0 release priorities

[Sebastian Rahtz]

Christian Wittern wrote:
> * While I am undecided on whether we need a module dependency, I think
>   we need to avoid producing invalid schemata whenever feasible.  This
>   includes detecting of (accidental?) deletion of essential elements.
>   My students here got a schema from Roma yesterday that happily
>   indicated TEI as the start element, although the element TEI was
>   deleted (together with the complete textstructure module). 
>   
There is a law of diminishing returns here, I think. Catering
for accidental deletion of <TEI> may be going too far.....


-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      

Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk