[tei-council] Class Struggle Notes for Dictionary and Drama Modules

[Laurent.Romary at loria.fr]

Selon "John A. Walsh" <jawalsh at indiana.edu>:

> +++Dictionary Module+++
>
> Element content models with possible class issues:
>
> <dicteg>
> "q | quote | cit" should be replaced by model.qLike

agree

>
> <entry>
> "hom | sense" are referenced directly in the content model. Are they
> likely to be extended with similarly behaving elements? If so, then
> they may be candidates for a class.

No. They have to be explicitly stated as part of <entry>. Leave as-is.

>
> <etym>
> Lots of individual elements in content model: "usg | lbl | def |
> trans | tr | dicteg | xr". These are a subset of model.entryParts.
> Are they likely to be extended with similarly behaving elements? If
> so, then they may be candidates for a class.

Yes. Make a class out of those elements.

>
> <hom>
> "sense" is referenced directly in the content model. It is also
> referenced in <re>. If similar-behaving elments are likely as
> extensions, perhaps it should be in a class of one.

cf. above. Leave as-is.

>
> <re>
> "sense" is referenced directly in the content model. It is also
> referenced in <hom>. If similar-behaving elments are likely as
> extensions, perhaps it should be in a class of one.

idem.

>
> <xr>
> <usg> and <lbl> are referenced directly in the content model. Are
> they likely to be extended with similarly behaving elements? If so,
> then they may be candidates for a class.
>

Yes.