[tei-council] More on TEI Lite: work in progress
Lou Burnard
lou.burnard at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk
Thu Feb 9 11:42:39 EST 2006
Sympathetic as I am to the suggestion that <g> should be usable in a TEI
Lite document, I am also feeling somewhat daunted at the extra baggage
this would entail. It isn't just a matter of adding <g>, you also have
to add all the paraphernalia of <charDesc> -- some dozen extra elements.
As a way forward, could all Council members take a moment to look at my
current draft for a P5 version of TEI Lite and dispassionately review
its contents? Suppose you have to nominate two or three topics/elements
which should be axed in favour of a proper treatment of <g> -- which
would they be?
I'm also ready to hear suggestions about things I have axed but should
restore, disagreement about the way I have expressed what I see as the
design goals for this revision, suggestions for a change of emphasis etc.
I am less disposed to hear arguments along the lines "we mustn't touch
this because it's already so widely deployed we can't change anything in
it"... there's a lot in the current TEI Lite which cannot be carried
forward unchanged from P4 to P5.
You can read the current draft at
http://www.tei-c.org/Drafts/lite-doc-p5.html
I would also like to open up this discussion to the hordes on TEI-L
soonish, unless anyone on the Council suggests that the whole enterprise
is fundamentally flawed.
Lou
John A. Walsh wrote:
> I'd also like to lobby for <g> in TEI Lite.
>
> John
> --
> | John A. Walsh
> | Associate Director for Projects and Services, Digital Library Program
> | Associate Librarian, University Libraries
> | Adjunct Associate Professor, Department of English
> | Indiana University, 1320 East Tenth Street, Bloomington, IN 47405
> | Voice:812-855-8758 Fax:812-856-2062 <mailto:jawalsh at indiana.edu>
>
>
>
> On Feb 8, 2006, at 7:58 PM, Christian Wittern wrote:
>
>> "Lou's Laptop" <lou.burnard at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk> writes:
>>
>>> Here's a brief note on some of the changes I am making in TEI Lite.
>>>
>> [...]
>>
>> All this looks fine to me. It seems it was time somebody looked at
>> TEILite carefully.
>>
>>> 8. I plan to axe most of the discussion of character entities.
>>
>>
>> Will you add the <g> instead? I would be *strongly* in favor of it!
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Wittern
>> Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
>> 47 Higashiogura-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8265, JAPAN
>> _______________________________________________
>> tei-council mailing list
>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
>
More information about the tei-council
mailing list