[tei-council] chapter ST
Sebastian Rahtz
Sebastian.Rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Fri Jan 20 12:31:15 EST 2006
James Cummings wrote:
> I can't think of what such a
> diagram would look like,
no more can I. But I also like the idea
of alternative graphical explanations alongside
the Gibbonesque prose
>
> 3.4 Elements defined: ____ (Blank). Are there no elements defined in the tei
> module available to all TEI modules
no. this is correct. I have corrected the XSLT to omit such emptiness
>
> 3.6.3 All the model.nameLike=notAllowed ... although you have explained
> notAllowed way back in 3.4, it would be really helpful to see the default of
> what should be allowed even if it hasn't been declared at this point. (i.e.
> what is the point of telling a novice user "model.nameLike = notAllowed" or
> "model.phrase = notAllowed" it isn't really helpful to them.
catered for in revised stylesheets. you now get a list of members
>
> 3.8 Any benefit in hiving off DTD-specific mechanisms discussion to a separate
> location?
I'd vote against....
--
Sebastian Rahtz
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
More information about the tei-council
mailing list