[tei-council] tei.metrical.components

[Laurent.Romary at loria.fr]

I was close to be convinced that <l> and <lg> are very simetrical with regards
the kind of information that may be attached to them. I am thus ready to see
them in the same class (althought I keep my general feeling concerning
recursion).
Laurent

Selon Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>:

> "We  never decided whether [tei.model.metrical] class contains only <l>
> or both <l> and <lg>. JC's notes say <l>, mine say undecided ... and
> LB's say <q>contains <l> or <lg>, except that Laurent  doesnt like the
> recursion</q>"
>
> Can we have a decision please?
>
> If Laurent's arguments are persuasive, may I suggest that we should
> define three classes:
>
> tei.model.metrical.terminal (member <l>)
> tei.model.metrical.nonterminal (member <lg>)
> tei.model.metrical (members
> tei.model.metrical.terminal|tei.model.nonterminal)
>
> {Probably not those names tho...}
>
> p.s. I see Syd is using <q> where he should be using <quote>  -- or
> should he? :-)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>