[tei-council] tei.bibl.phrase

[Lou Burnard]

Syd Bauman wrote:

>| * new class, tei.biblPhrases containing <title>, <date>,
>|   <dateRange>, and <author>, i.e. things that are members of both
>|   tei.phrase and tei.biblPart, such that the new class will be a
>|   subclass of each.
>| 
>| Can someone explain this? Both my notes and JC's notes say this,
>| but it doesn't make sense to me.<title>, <date>, <dateRange>, and
>| <author> are not part of tei.phrase at least not directly (and
>| <author> not at all). Nor are they part of tei.biblPart.
>
>  
>
>><title> etc. are all members of phrase indirectly -- <title> via 
>>hqhrase, <date> and <dateRange> via tei.data. <author> is a member of 
>>tei.biblPart.
>>    
>>
>
>Right, so none of the elements mentioned are in fact in both classes.
>Are there any elements that are a member of both? I don't think we
>have the right criteria for the members of this new class, here.
>  
>

I agree. I think what we wanted to do was identify a new sub-class of 
phrase containing the components of <bibl> which were not already 
members of tei.biblPart, factoring them out of the definition of phrase 
in the process.  <author> doesnt belong in the list at all, since it's a 
member of tei.biblPart.

The issue now becomes whether a reference to tei.phrase.bibl  would make 
sense wherever we currently have a reference to either tei.hqphrase or 
tei.data

If it wouldnt, and if we want to retain those class memberships for 
<title>, <date>, <dateRange> then there is no point in defining this new 
class.