[tei-council] datatype issues (part 1)

[Laurent Romary]

Le 11 sept. 05, à 16:06, Syd Bauman a écrit :

>
>> 6. tei.data.sex defines four alphabetic values (m f x u) which
>> correspond to ISO 5218 numeric codes 1 2 0 and 9. Should we not
>> rather use the ISO codes?
>>

There is also the possibility that we keep the TEI values for our users 
and use <equiv> to mark the link with ISO values.
Laurent