[tei-council] directory layout again

[Natasha Smith]

> >>  /usr/share/xml/teiclassic
> >>  /usr/share/xml/tei
> >>  /usr/share/xml/docbook
> >>  /usr/share/xml/xhtml

i liked this idea for its lucidity. there were many good ideas along the
way, but not once they clashed and contradicted. this one gave a
prospective to look at the structure in a much more clear way - at least
to me. Classic? hmmm, why not leave it as p4? Everybody know what it is,
only if we want to raise it to the rank of living classics...

n

> >> so there would be no "p4" or "p5" layers anywhere, you would just choose
> >> a tree at the top level to work with. It simplifies lots of things, and
> >> makes it
> >> easier to document. I cannot think of a situation where we mingle P4 
> >> and P5.
> >>
> >> What do folks think? I know the big problem is that only one thing can
> >> be called "tei",
> >> so either P4 or P5 gets a new name. I believe that P5 should get the
> >> "tei" name, since
> >> it is where we are working, and we have started on our 0.1 release.
> > 
> > Just for the record, I think this is a brilliant idea.
> 
> I think it is a good idea... though I must admit some apprehensions 
> with the name teiclassic.
> 
> -James
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>