[tei-council] review process for P5 (MS chapter) -- vote required

[James Cummings]

Christian Wittern wrote:

>Council members,
>
>It has been almost ten days since I posted this and I have seen three
>positive votes (one from Laurent in a private mail).  I would not like
>to rely solely on silent consent, so please put your voice on the
>record.   We need to be able to come to decisions like these in a
>timely manner, so that the work can be done.
>  
>
I think it is a good idea as well.

-James

>All the best,
>
>Christian
>
>
>
>Christian Wittern <wittern at kanji.zinbun.kyoto-u.ac.jp> writes:
>
>  
>
>>Dear Council members,
>>
>>In an attempt to move forward P5, Lou suggested to me to establish a
>>review process for areas in need of specific attention.  One of the
>>areas where such a process could be fruitful,  he suggested, would be
>>the MS chapter.  We do have a new draft from the WG, but it would be
>>good to get a more diversified range of opinions on the currently
>>state, especially with view to possible omissions or oversights, etc.
>>I would like therefore to ask Council members to form an opinion on
>>this issue and express it here on our list.  If the Council accepts
>>this, I would like to ask Matthew as the Chair of the MS effort to
>>name about 7 or 8 people we could ask to act as reviewers.  If this
>>works out well, we might also consider this model for other chapters
>>and /or proposed changes.
>>
>>All the best,
>>
>>Christian
>>_______________________________________________
>>tei-council mailing list
>>tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>    
>>
>
>  
>