[tei-council] addendum to agenda (biblItem)

[Laurent Romary]

Dear all,
As I will not be able to attend to conference call (another meeting  
planned in Sarrebrucken at that time), I quickly give my view on this  
topic:
- I have a strong intuition that the proposal based on biblItem is a  
good direction to go (a lot of things are made clearer)
- I do not see why there is a need for relatedBiblItem, where a  
recursive biblItem (together with the attributes that are contemplated)  
would do the trick, it seems. My main arguments are:
	* design simplicity: why two objects with nearly the same semantics  
should be so much differentiated
	* practicality and coherence: if the relatedBiblItem objects are  
described elsewhere in the same or another document, then they are  
likely to be described as biblItem. They would thus change nature  
depending on whether a reference to them is made in an inline way  
(relatedBiblItem) or stand-off way (biblItem)
Best
Laurent

Le 27 nov. 04, à 01:16, Christian Wittern a écrit :

>
> Dear Councillors,
>
> Syd sent me an additional agenda item, please look at the document.  I
> will send a revised agenda out in time before the meeting.
>
>
>> Lou and I would like to add a discussion of bibliographic
>> entries. The main discussion is currently at
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/download.php? 
>> group_id=106328&atid=644065&file_id=98435&aid=1012350,
>> but I hope to have a slightly condensed, slightly easier-to-read
>> version available soon.
>
> Document is now at
>   http://www.tei-c.org/Council/sfw01.html
>   http://www.tei-c.org/Council/sfw01.xml
>
>
> All the best,
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
>
>  Christian Wittern
>  Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
>  47 Higashiogura-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8265, JAPAN
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>