Terminology chapter in P5

Sebastian Rahtz sebastian.rahtz at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk
Mon Dec 8 19:28:29 EST 2003



I feel agnostic about the chapter in general. But I note that in its 
embarassing duplication of element names and patterns
it is no longer an acceptable citizen of the TEI world.

I suspect that what is good in it can be reforged, like the Sword that 
was Broken, by someone
willing to put in 2 or 3 days work.

Sebastian



More information about the tei-council mailing list