agenda for Tuesday's conference call

Tomaz Erjavec tomaz.erjavec at ijs.si
Tue Mar 18 05:44:04 EST 2003



Dear John, all,
I'm afraid I'll have to give this call a miss - I became a
father last week, and wife and daughter came home from the hospital
yesterday, a bit sooner than expected. So I'll be staying at home
today & will just wish you all a very productive chat! 
Best, 
Tomaz

<p>John Unsworth writes:
 > Folks,
 > 
 > Here's the agenda for the TEI Conference Call.  If I've forgotten anything, 
 > bring it up under item 0, amendments to the agenda.
 > 
 > John
 > 
 > ---------------------
 > 
 > TEI Council Conference Call
 > 
 > Date: Tuesday, March 18th
 > 
 > Time: The call will take place at the usual time--1 pm UTC (adjust for your 
 > local time...which you can do at
 > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedform.html).  As a reminder, 
 > that's 5 am in California, 8 am in Indiana and on the East Coast, 1 pm in 
 > London and elsewhere in that time zone, and so on, until 10 pm in Japan.
 > 
 > Numbers:  for conference call:  +1 812-856-3550, Passcode 0612#
 > 	      for help during conference call (Jen Riley): +1 812-856-5759
 > 	      Perry's phone number (busy during conference call):  +1 812-855-9290
 > 
 > Duration: The agenda (below) is for a 90-minute call.
 > 
 > Minutes: The minutes from our last meeting are at 
 > http://www.tei-c.org/Council/tcm04.html
 > 
 > Agenda:
 > 
 > 0. Amendments to the agenda
 > 
 > 1. Approve EDW78 (on the handling of non-trivial revisions to the 
 > guidelines) at http://www.tei-c.org/Drafts/edw78.html
 > 
 > 2. Report from Chris Ruotolo on the XML migration workgroup
 > 
 > 3. Report from Christian Wittern on the question of text in attribute 
 > values: see 
 > http://lists.village.virginia.edu/lists_archive/tei-council/0468.html and 
 > Sebastian's brief response, 
 > http://lists.village.virginia.edu/lists_archive/tei-council/0469.html
 > 
 > 4. Report from David Durand on Standoff Markup 
 > (http://www.tei-c.org/Activities/SO/)
 > 
 > 5. Manuscript Description:  Merrilee will need to give us a report on where 
 > things are with Consuelo, and then Matthew Driscoll should be given 
 > permission to proceed with the task force on manuscript 
 > description.  Council members can find materials from Consuelo's group at 
 > http://www.merrilee.org/tei-mss/
 > 
 > 6. Report from Sebastian on the architectural issues working group--who is 
 > on it, how it's working, whether it's made any progress, etc.
 > 
 > 7. Report from Laurent and possibly Lou about the feature-structures 
 > working group (see proposed charter for feature-structure workgroup at 
 > http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Council/tcw01.html -- but there's nothing there at 
 > the moment -- and draft of the letter proposing a TEI liaison to ISO on 
 > feature structures at http://www.tei-c.org/Council/LiaisonLetter.htm)
 > 
 > 8. Task force on trees and graphs.  Materials at 
 > http://www.tei-c.org/Activities/GD/.  His draft call for participation 
 > (which could serve as a charge to the task force, in slightly different 
 > form) looks like this:
 > 
 > 	Graphs, Networks and Trees! Oh, My! Graphs, Networks and Trees! Oh My!
 > 
 > 	Well, at least you won't have to worry about flying monkeys in the TEI 
 > task force on possible revision of Chapter 21, 	Graphs, Networks and Trees 
 > of TEI P4.
 > 
 > 	This informal task force is limited to considering the question of whether 
 > Chapter 21 should be revised, should it 	simply incoporate some other 
 > markup standard or simply refer readers elsewhere.
 > 
 > 	At the heart of such an inquiry, is a comparison of the current TEI with 
 > other graph encoding methods. In other 	words, does TEI provide any 
 > capabilities not found elsewhere and does it lack abilities found 
 > elsewhere? (The 	useage of the TEI graph chapter should also be considered.)
 > 
 > 	No physical meetings will be held and to ease the reading burden, 
 > summaries of both the current Chapter 21 as 	well as the extant 
 > alternatives have been prepared for your review. Suggestions of other 
 > alternatives and corrections 	to the proposed summaries are welcome.
 > 
 > 	Discussions and drafting of the report will be conducted entirely by 
 > email. With the provided summaries, it should 	not require more than 20-30 
 > hours total, to participate in this task force up to the filing of its 
 > final report.
 > 
 > 	The final deliverable will be a very short, 3-5 page report to the TEI 
 > Council on the recommendations of the task 	force. All participants will be 
 > listed at the conclusion of that report. (Here is your chance to help with 
 > the ongoing 	revision of the TEI Guidelines, along with public 
 > acknowledgement of your role.)
 > 
 > 
 > 9. Update from Perry on the IMLS proposal, if any
 > 
 > 10. Report from Alois on EU grant prospects, if any.
 > 
 > 11. May Council meeting
 > 
 > 12. Other business



More information about the tei-council mailing list