Re: Nietzsche and Metaphysics

Krista Henriksen (khenriks@sfu.ca)
Tue, 27 May 1986 08:59:55 -0700

At 04:19 AM 5/26/97 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
>>I am a writer who began as a painter. What I see in Nietzsche is that
>>his thought breaks all parameters set forth by the strictures of
>>language. His thought shines through clearly from his every written
>>word.
>
>But did his thought twist free of conventional metaphysics? Nietzsche
>claimed that it did. I claim that it did not. Heidegger claims that it
>did not. Rorty claims that it did not.

What does twisting free from conventional metaphysics have to do with the
art of his writing? Nietzsche wrote nothing without supreme
self-consciousness and specific intention--he wrote blood. For art itself
it is worthwhile. Reading Nietzsche does not necessarily mean divining the
meaning of his text in any sort of prescriptive manner, it means reading and
writing, it means reveling in his humor, his art, it means producing a
reading. Nietzsche may not twist free of conventional metaphysics in
Rorty's (who has never twisted free of anything in his life), Heidegger's,
and your, minds, but his words, at least for me hold magic in their
precision and art. What makes Nietzsche so much fun is that one can read
him so many ways.

--- from list nietzsche@jefferson.village.virginia.edu ---