---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 13:54:51 -0800
From: radtimes <email@example.com>
Subject: Which Side Are You On?
Which Side Are You On?
By Marty Jezer, AlterNet
October 24, 2002
All honor to those early American political leaders who would not ratify
the U.S. Constitution until it included a Bill of Rights. And a special
"right on" to James Madison and the others who drafted those
remarkable 10 amendments, especially the first one that gives us the
right of free speech, a free press, freedom of religion and "the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a
redress of grievances."
Friday at 10:00 p.m. I board one of two buses from Brattleboro to
Washington, bound for Saturday's anti-war demonstration. We drive all
night, attend the rally during the day, and then get back on the buses for
the return trip to Brattleboro. I've never liked going to demonstrations in
Washington and this is my first one since 1968. But people have to
stand up and be counted.
The opponents of the proposed war on Iraq represent majority opinion.
The Bush Administration and the government of Britain's Tony Blair
stand alone in the world in pushing for a go-it-alone military action. The
Bush Doctrine of American world dominance, backed by overwhelming
military force and a self-proclaimed right to use it whenever and
wherever we like, is so abhorrent and misguided as to incite worldwide
protestwhich it has!
In Britain, Blair faces serious opposition even within his own Labor
Party. Though the Bush Administration won the endorsement of
Congress, many congressional supporters, like Senators Kerry, Daschle
and Feinstein, have expressed disquiet. This is not to excuse their votes;
given their criticisms, it represents a collective act of cowardice and an
abrogation of leadership that they will surely regret.
In this vacuum of leadership, a coalition calling itself ANSWER (for
"Act Now to Stop War & End Racism), composed of a myriad of
anti-war and progressive organizations, has come together to plan this
demonstration. The right wing, when it rallies in Washington, does so
with a unitary voice and a singular focus that Vladimir Ilich Lenin would
The anti-war movement, on the other hand, speaks with many, and
often contradictory, voices. I'm grateful that ANSWER took the
initiative in calling this demonstration. But most people going to
Washington will not have heard of the organizations in the ANSWER
coalition and will likely disagree with the rhetoric of some of the
speakers. No matter! Like me, they'll be protesting out of their own
personal politics and outrage.
Americans have been marching on Washington to petition for a redress
of grievances for more than 100 years. In 1894, during one of
America's cyclical economic depressions (this one brought about by
corporate corruption, stock market speculation, low farm prices and
non-livable wagessound familiar?), unemployed workers, led by
Jacob Coxey and thus dubbed "Coxey's Army," marched on
Washington to demand federal funding for public works. Coxey was
arrested and the marchers were dispersed.
It took 40 years and FDR's New Deal for the idea of public job
creation to become public policy. Public investment, except for war, has
little support within the current administration. Those of us rallying in
Washington on Saturday, Oct. 26, embody the spirit of Coxey's Army.
The 1963 March on Washington, where Martin Luther King Jr. gave his
"I Have A Dream Speech," was a defining moment for the civil rights
movement. But it took nonviolent sit-ins and civil disobedience, people
putting themselves into dangerous situations, to win legal civil and voting
rights for all African Americans.
The Vietnam War saw numerous anti-war demonstrations in
Washington. Some included civil disobedience. A few, especially the
later ones, were compromised by splinter-group violence.
Demonstrators who come to a nonviolent march or rally and commit
acts of violence are doing the work of agent provocateurs no matter
what their intention.
Great speeches and inspiring moments are rare at demonstrations. In
1966, at a rally in front of the White House, Carl Oglesby, the new and
then unknown president of Students for a Democratic Society, gave an
oration titled "Let Us Shape The Future" that galvanized the audience,
brought people cheering and to their feet. In it he made the distinction
between corporate liberals who serve the corporate state and
humanistic liberals who profess higher ideals. The details of the speech
are bound up in history, but Oglesby's distinction directly addresses the
problems of the Democratic Party today.
The only other inspiring moment I remember was at the Washington
Monument in 1969 when Dr. Spock, the beloved baby doctor, and
Pete Seeger led more than a million people in John Lennon's "Give
Peace A Chance." The astonishing size of that demonstration had a
profound effect on government policy, encouraging wavering politicians
to decisively break with the Vietnam policy of the Johnson
A huge turnout at tomorrow's demonstration could have a similar effect.
That's the main reason I'm going: to be a number. If there are enough of
us in Washington, politicians may be emboldened to say what they're
My first anti-war demonstration was a 1965 march down New York's
Fifth Avenue to protest the war in Vietnam. I had already written
members of Congress and my then liberal hero, Vice President Hubert
Humphrey. Now it was time to act. The New York newspapers had
red-baited the parade, claiming it had been organized by Communists. It
was very uncomfortable, that first time, publicly protesting the policies of
my country. But I knew we were in the right, and I felt emboldened by
"Which side are you on"? an old labor song asks. You study an issue,
discuss it with people you trust, question the assumptions of both the
advocates and the dissenters, consult your conscience and then, when
you make your decision, you act.
That's what the patriots who pushed for and conceived the Bill of Rights
were thinking. Americans have the right to dissent, directly to our
government. Protest is patriotic, and this protest, most especially this
protest, is essential for the soul and safety of the country.
Marty Jezer's books include "Abbie Hoffman: American Rebel." He
writes from Brattleboro, Vermont and welcomes comments at
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Nov 09 2002 - 22:49:11 EST