[sixties-l] Antiwar history of USC still evident (fwd)

From: sixties@lists.village.virginia.edu
Date: Mon Oct 28 2002 - 13:58:33 EST

  • Next message: sixties@lists.village.virginia.edu: "[sixties-l] Veteran anti-war protesters still demonstrating for peace (fwd)"

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:16:43 -0800
    From: radtimes <resist@best.com>
    Subject: Antiwar history of USC still evident

    Antiwar history of USC still evident

    <http://www.dailytrojan.com/article.do?issue=/V147/N44&id=04-anti.44c.html>

    Activism: Demonstrations today limited to debates, other peaceful approaches

    October 28, 2002
    By ALISON SHACKELFORD
    Contributing Writer

    A look at the current political climate as well as USC students' reactions
    to the first U.S. war against Iraq may explain why the possibility of a
    second war against Iraq has produced relatively little protest at USC.
     From Iraq's August 1990 invasion of Kuwait to America's January 1991
    invasion of Iraq, there was little discussion and even less action at USC
    regarding Saddam Hussein, Daily Trojan archives showed. But once the
    Persian Gulf War began, coverage of the Middle East sprang from the
    opinion pages to the news pages.
    USC antiwar protests were countered with USC rallies supporting U.S.
    troops. Students were up in arms. They used graffiti and vandalism to
    express their views.
    A Jan. 18, 1991, article noted that the wave of campus activism was out
    of character for USC and reflected the "flower child" USC had not seen
    since the 1960s rather than the more traditional "spoiled child" of USC.
    Two weeks after the war began, a Feb. 6, 1991, news article revealed
    that visible student expressions about the war were already dwindling.
    Today, student sentiment against a war with Iraq runs high even though
    war was still only a possibility, said Heather McLean, a senior majoring in
    international relations and the president of the campus group Peace and
    Conflict Scholars.
    "Besides a few random people who have come to our table on Trousdale
    who have been emphatically pro-war, I would say 99 percent of students
    are against war or at least the way the U.S. is going about it," she said.
    She cited e-mails from students, meetings with groups from other
    campuses and an enthusiastic response to peace pledges the group passed
    out for people to sign as evidence of student opinion against a war with
    Iraq.
    But while student opinion may be strong, student activism has restricted
    itself to discussions, debates and forums.
    Students have been even less active than they were 12 years ago, said
    Gerald Bender, professor of international relations. Though an informal
    survey conducted the first day of class in one of his general education
    courses showed 80 of 159 students were against the war, evidence of that
    opinion in terms of activism remained low on campus.
    "Bush Jr.'s popularity and strong will has neutralized the situation," Bender
    said. "People don't understand all the issues, but there's a tendency to go
    along with the president even though this time a war is an easier thing to
    protest. In 1991, Iraq clearly invaded another country."
    The possibility of a war now has no such clear impetus. Yet in 1991,
    Bender said, the Congressional vote for support of the elder Bush was
    close, whereas this time it was not close at all, with the younger Bush
    garnering a clear majority.
    "If you're opposed to the war, you have to come out you can't just
    keep it to yourself," McLean said. "There's more student apathy today
    and not as much awareness, and I think our government likes that. The
    feeling that you can change policy by going out on the streets and
    protesting is a fleeting memory for this generation, and I think sadly what's
    going to be the wake-up call is this war if it happens. I mean, how many
    body bags do you want to see?"
    So groups such as Peace and Conflict Scholars were working to educate
    students about the current international situation.
    Peace and Conflict Scholars headed up activities for Peace Week on
    campus last week, including a peace assembly Friday on Trousdale
    Parkway, followed by an all-night bus trip to a Saturday-morning protest
    in San Francisco.
    The Muslim Students Association took a similar approach, working to
    educate students about the issues.
    "The problem is not a war on Iraq it's the lack of understanding,"
    Karim Vidhani, a freshman majoring in electrical engineering and a
    member of MSA, said in an e-mail.
    To increase understanding, MSA planned an Islamic awareness week,
    beginning today and lasting through Thursday, on Trousdale.
    "We hope students can take this opportunity to understand what Islam is
    and who we are," Vidhani said.
    Human Rights Watch University, the largest U.S. human rights
    organization in the world, has also sponsored a number of events on
    USC's campus aimed at educating students.
    "A lot of people are concerned and scared and they have a lot of
    unanswered questions," said Peter Bouckaert, senior emergencies
    researcher for Human Rights Watch. "But a lot of people are too afraid to
    ask those questions."
    Bouckaert, who travels to war zones for Human Rights Watch to
    document abuses, returned from a trip to Iraq on Wednesday. The goal,
    he said, was to provide information to the public about abuses facing the
    Iraqi people now and the abuses they would face if the United States went
    to war against Iraq.
    Bouckaert is no stranger to protesting against war in Iraq. In January
    1991, he was arrested as a member of the so-called "Cheadle 200" who
    took over a building at the University of California, Santa Barbara, in one
    of the largest protests against the Gulf War at the time.
    Today's lack of student protest against the possibility of a war against Iraq
    was because of a national unwillingness to examine government actions
    too closely since Sept. 11 and because of U.S. Attorney General John
    Ashcroft's minimal tolerance for critics, Bouckaert said.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 28 2002 - 14:44:23 EST