The Others: What If We Could See the Afghan Dead as We've Seen the September
11 Victims?
Common Dreams NewsCenter
Support Common Dreams
Home |
Newswire |
About Us |
Donate
|
Sign-Up
Friday, January 25, 2002
Featured Views
Email
Share This Article With Your Friends
Published in the February 14, 2002 issue of
The Nation
The Others
What If We Could See the Afghan Dead as We've Seen the September 11 Victims?
by Howard Zinn
Every day for several months, the New York Times did what should always be
done when a tragedy is summed up in a statistic: It gave us miniature
portraits
of the human beings who died on September 11--their names, photos, glimmers
of their personalities, their idiosyncrasies, how friends and loved ones
remember
them.
As the director of the New-York Historical Society said: "The peculiar
genius of it was to put a human face on numbers that are unimaginable to
most of
us.... It's so obvious that every one of them was a person who deserved to
live a full and successful and happy life. You see what was lost."
I was deeply moved, reading those intimate sketches--"A Poet of
Bensonhurst...A Friend, A Sister...Someone to Lean On...Laughter, Win or
Lose..." I thought:
Those who celebrated the grisly deaths of the people in the twin towers and
the Pentagon as a blow to symbols of American dominance in the world--what
if, instead of symbols, they could see, up close, the faces of those who
lost their lives? I wonder if they would have second thoughts, second
feelings.
Then it occurred to me: What if all those Americans who declare their
support for Bush's "war on terrorism" could see, instead of those elusive
symbols--Osama
bin Laden, Al Qaeda--the real human beings who have died under our bombs? I
do believe they would have second thoughts.
There are those on the left, normally compassionate people whose instincts
go against war, who were, surprisingly, seduced by early Administration
assurances
and consoled themselves with words like "limited" military action and
"measured" response. I think they, too, if confronted with the magnitude of
the human
suffering caused by the war in Afghanistan, would have second thoughts.
True, there are those in Washington and around the country who would not be
moved, who are eager--like their counterparts elsewhere in the world--to
kill
for some cause. But most Americans would begin to understand that we have
been waging a war on ordinary men, women and children. And that these human
beings
have died because they happened to live in Afghan villages in the vicinity
of vaguely defined "military targets," and that the bombing that destroyed
their
lives is in no way a war on terrorism, because it has no chance of ending
terrorism and is itself a form of terrorism.
But how can this be done--this turning of ciphers into human beings? In
contrast with the vignettes about the the victims featured in the New York
Times,
there are few available details about the dead men, women and children in
Afghanistan.
We would need to study the scattered news reports, usually in the inside
sections of the Times and the Washington Post, but also in the international
press--Reuters;
the London Times, Guardian and Independent; and Agence France-Presse.
These reports have been mostly out of sight of the general public (indeed,
virtually never reported on national television, where most Americans get
their
news), and so dispersed as to reinforce the idea that the bombing of
civilians has been an infrequent event, a freak accident, an unfortunate
mistake.
Listen to the language of the Pentagon: "We cannot confirm the
report...civilian casualties are inevitable...we don't know if they were our
weapons...it
was an accident...incorrect coordinates had been entered...they are
deliberately putting civilians in our bombing targets...the village was a
legitimate
military target...it just didn't happen...we regret any loss of civilian
life."
"Collateral damage," Timothy McVeigh said, using a Pentagon expression, when
asked about the children who died when he bombed the federal building in
Oklahoma
City. After reports of the bombing of one village, Pentagon spokeswoman
Victoria Clarke said, "We take extraordinary care.... There is unintended
damage.
There is collateral damage. Thus far, it has been extremely limited." The
Agence France-Presse reporter quoting her said: "Refugees arriving in
Pakistan
suggested otherwise. Several recounted how twenty people, including nine
children, had been killed as they tried to flee an attack on the southern
Afghan
town of Tirin Kot."
Listening to the repeated excuses given by Bush, Rumsfeld and others, one
recalls Colin Powell's reply at the end of the Gulf War, when questioned
about
Iraqi casualties: "That is really not a matter I am terribly interested in."
If, indeed, a strict definition of the word "deliberate" does not apply to
the bombs dropped on the civilians of Afghanistan, then we can offer,
thinking back to Powell's statement, an alternate characterization: "a
reckless disregard
for human life."
The denials of the Pentagon are uttered confidently half a world away in
Washington. But there are on-the-spot press reports from the villages, from
hospitals
where the wounded lie and from the Pakistan border, where refugees have fled
the bombs. If we put these reports together, we get brief glimpses of the
human tragedies in Afghanistan--the names of the dead, the villages that
were bombed, the words of a father who lost his children, the ages of the
children.
We would then have to multiply these stories by the hundreds, think of the
unreported incidents and know that the numbers go into the thousands. A
professor
of economics at the University of New Hampshire, Marc Herold, has done a far
more thorough survey of the press than I have. He lists location, type of
weapon used and sources of information. He finds the civilian death toll in
Afghanistan up to December 10 exceeding 3,500 (he has since raised the
figure
to 4,000), a sad and startling parallel to the number of victims in the twin
towers.
The New York Times was able to interrogate friends and family of the New
York dead, but for the Afghans, we will have to imagine the hopes and dreams
of
those who died, especially the children, for whom forty or fifty years of
mornings, love, friendship, sunsets and the sheer exhilaration of being
alive
were extinguished by monstrous machines sent over their land by men far
away.
My intention is not at all to diminish our compassion for the victims of the
terrorism of September 11, but to enlarge that compassion to include the
victims
of all terrorism, in any place, at any time, whether perpetrated by Middle
East fanatics or American politicians.
In that spirit, I present the following news items (only a fraction of those
in my files), hoping that there is the patience to go through them, like the
patience required to read the portraits of the September 11 dead, like the
patience required to read the 58,000 names on the Vietnam Memorial:
>From a hospital in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, reported in the Boston Globe by
John Donnelly on December 5:
"In one bed lay Noor Mohammad, 10, who was a bundle of bandages. He lost his
eyes and hands to the bomb that hit his house after Sunday dinner. Hospital
director Guloja Shimwari shook his head at the boy's wounds. 'The United
States must be thinking he is Osama,' Shimwari said. 'If he is not Osama,
then
why would they do this?'"
The report continued:
"The hospital's morgue received 17 bodies last weekend, and officials here
estimate at least 89 civilians were killed in several villages. In the
hospital
yesterday, a bomb's damage could be chronicled in the life of one family. A
bomb had killed the father, Faisal Karim. In one bed was his wife, Mustafa
Jama, who had severe head injuries.... Around her, six of her children were
in bandages.... One of them, Zahidullah, 8, lay in a coma."
In the New York Times, Barry Bearak, reporting December 15 from the village
of Madoo, Afghanistan, tells of the destruction of fifteen houses and their
occupants. "'In the night, as we slept, they dropped the bombs on us,' said
Paira Gul, a young man whose eyes were aflame with bitterness. His sisters
and their families had perished, he said.... The houses were small, the
bombing precise. No structure escaped the thundering havoc. Fifteen houses,
15
ruins.... 'Most of the dead are children,' Tor Tul said."
Another Times reporter, C.J. Chivers, writing from the village of Charykari
on December 12, reported "a terrifying and rolling barrage that the
villagers
believe was the payload of an American B-52.... The villagers say 30 people
died.... One man, Muhibullah, 40, led the way through his yard and showed
three
unexploded cluster bombs he is afraid to touch. A fourth was not a dud. It
landed near his porch. 'My son was sitting there...the metal went inside
him.'
The boy, Zumarai, 5, is in a hospital in Kunduz, with wounds to leg and
abdomen. His sister, Sharpari, 10, was killed. 'The United States killed my
daughter
and injured my son,' Mr. Muhibullah said. 'Six of my cows were destroyed and
all of my wheat and rice was burned. I am very angry. I miss my daughter.'"
>From the Washington Post, October 24, from Peshawar, Pakistan, by Pamela
Constable: "Sardar, a taxi driver and father of 12, said his family had
spent night
after night listening to the bombing in their community south of Kabul. One
night during the first week, he said, a bomb aimed at a nearby radio station
struck a house, killing all five members of the family living there. 'There
was no sign of a home left,' he said. 'We just collected the pieces of
bodies
and buried them.'"
Reporter Catherine Philp of the Times of London, reporting October 25 from
Quetta, Pakistan: "It was not long after 7 pm on Sunday when the bombs began
to fall over the outskirts of Torai village.... Rushing outside, Mauroof saw
a massive fireball. Morning brought an end to the bombing and...a neighbor
arrived to tell him that some 20 villagers had been killed in the blasts,
among them ten of his relatives. 'I saw the body of one of my
brothers-in-law
being pulled from the debris,' Mauroof said. 'The lower part of his body had
been blown away. Some of the other bodies were unrecognizable. There were
heads missing and arms blown off....' The roll call of the dead read like an
invitation list to a family wedding: his mother-in-law, two sisters-in-law,
three brothers-in-law, and four of his sister's five young children, two
girls and two boys, all under the age of eight."
Human Rights Watch report, October 26: "Twenty-five-year-old
Samiullah...rushed home to rescue his family.... he found the bodies of his
twenty-year-old
wife and three of his children: Mohibullah, aged six; Harifullah, aged
three; and Bibi Aysha, aged one.... Also killed were his two brothers,
Nasiullah,
aged eight, and Ghaziullah, aged six, as well as two of his sisters, aged
fourteen and eleven."
>From Reuters, October 28, Sayed Salahuddin reporting from Kabul: "A U.S.
bomb flattened a flimsy mud-brick home in Kabul Sunday, blowing apart seven
children
as they ate breakfast with their father.... Sobs racked the body of a
middle-aged man as he cradled the head of his baby, its dust-covered body
dressed
only in a blue diaper, lying beside the bodies of three other children,
their colorful clothes layered with debris from their shattered homes."
Washington Post Foreign Service, November 2, from Quetta, Pakistan, by Rajiv
Chandrasekaran: "The thunder of the first explosions jolted Nasir Ahmed
awake....
he grabbed his 14-year-old niece and scurried into a communal courtyard.
>From there, he said, they watched as civilians who survived the bombing run,
including
his niece and a woman holding her 5-year-old son, were gunned down by a
slow-moving, propeller-driven aircraft circling overheard. When the gunship
departed
an hour later, at least 25 people in the village--all civilians--were dead,
according to accounts of the incident provided today by Ahmed, two other
witnesses,
and several relatives of people in the village.
"The Pentagon confirmed that the village was hit...but officials said they
believe the aircraft struck a legitimate military target.... Asked about
civilian
casualties, the official said, 'We don't know. We're not on the ground.'
"Shaida, 14.... 'Americans are not good.... They killed my mother. They
killed my father. I don't understand why.'"
A Newsday report on November 24 from Kabul, by James Rupert: "In the
sprawling, mud-brick slum of Qala-ye-Khatir, most men were kneeling in the
mosques
at morning prayer on November 6 when a quarter-ton of steel and high
explosives hurtled from the sky into the home of Gul Ahmed, a carpet weaver.
The American
bomb detonated, killing Ahmed, his five daughters, one of his wives, and a
son. Next door, it demolished the home of Sahib Dad and killed two of his
children....
"Ross Chamberlain, the coordinator for U.N. mine-clearing operations in much
of Afghanistan.... 'There's really no such thing as a precision bombing....
We are finding more cases of errant targeting than accurate targeting, more
misses than hits.'"
The New York Times, November 22, from Ghaleh Shafer, Afghanistan:
"10-year-old Mohebolah Seraj went out to collect wood for his family, and
thought he had
happened upon a food packet. He picked it up and lost three fingers in an
explosion. Doctors say he will probably lose his whole hand.... his mother,
Sardar
Seraj...said that she cried and told the doctors not to cut off her son's
whole hand...
"The hospital where her son is being cared for is a grim place, lacking
power and basic sanitation. In one room lay Muhammad Ayoub, a 20-year-old
who was
in the house when the cluster bomb initially landed. He lost a leg and his
eyesight, and his face was severely disfigured. He moaned in agony....
Hospital
officials said that a 16-year-old had been decapitated."
A New York Times report on December 3 from Jalalabad, Afghanistan, by Tim
Weiner: "The commanders, who are pro-American...say that four nearby
villages
were struck this weekend, leaving 80 or more people dead and others
wounded.... The villages are near Tora Bora, the mountain camp where Mr. bin
Laden
is presumed to be hiding. A Pentagon spokesman said Saturday that the
bombing of civilians near Tora Bora 'never happened.'
"Eight men guarding the building [a district office building]...were killed,
[mujahedeen commander] Hajji Zaman said. He gave the names of the dead as
Zia
ul-Hassan, 16; Wilayat Khan, 17; Abdul Wadi, 20; Jany, 22; Abdul Wahid, 30;
Hajji Wazir, 35; Hajji Nasser, also 35; and Awlia Gul, 37.... Ali Shah, 26,
of Landa Khel, said, 'There is no one in this village who is part of Al
Qaeda.'
"Witnesses said that at least 50 and as many as 200 villagers had been
killed.
"'We are poor people,' [Muhammad] Tahir said. 'Our trees are our only
shelter from the cold and wind. The trees have been bombed. Our waterfall,
our only
source of water--they bombed it. Where is the humanity?'"
The Independent, December 4: "The village where nothing happened.... The
cemetery on the hill contains 40 freshly dug graves, unmarked and identical.
And
the village of Kama Ado has ceased to exist.... And all this is very strange
because, on Saturday morning--when American B-52s unloaded dozens of bombs
that killed 115 men, women and children--nothing happened.... We know this
because the U.S. Department of Defence told us so.... 'It just didn't
happen.'"
The New York Times, December 12, David Rohde, writing from Ghazni,
Afghanistan: "Each ward of the Ghazni Hospital features a new calamity. In
the first,
two 14-year-old boys had lost parts of their hands when they picked up land
mines. 'I was playing with a toy and it exploded' said one of them, Muhammad
Allah.... a woman named Rose lay on a bed in the corner of the room,
grunting with each breath. Her waiflike children slept nearby, whimpering
periodically.
Early on Sunday morning, shrapnel from an American bomb tore through the
woman's abdomen, broke her 4-year-old son's leg and ripped into her
6-year-old
daughter's head, doctors here said. A second 6-year-old girl in the room was
paralyzed from the waist down. X-rays showed how a tiny shard of metal had
neatly severed her spinal cord."
Reported in the Chicago Tribune, December 28, by Paul Salopek, from Madoo,
Afghanistan: "'American soldiers came after the bombing and asked if any Al
Qaeda
had lived here,' said villager Paira Gul. 'Is that an Al Qaeda?' Gul asked,
pointing to a child's severed foot he had excavated minutes earlier from a
smashed house. 'Tell me' he said, his voice choking with fury, 'is that what
an Al Qaeda looks like?'"
Reuters, December 31, from Qalaye Niazi, Afghanistan: "Janat Gul said 24
members of his family were killed in the pre-dawn U.S. bombing raid on
Qalaye Niazi,
and described himself as the sole survivor.... In the U.S. Major Pete
Mitchell--a spokesman for U.S. Central Command--said: 'We are aware of the
incident
and we are currently investigating.'"
Yes, these reports appeared, but scattered through the months of bombing and
on the inside pages, or buried in larger stories and accompanied by solemn
government denials. With no access to alternative information, it is not
surprising that a majority of Americans have approved of what they have been
led
to think is a "war on terrorism."
Recall that Americans at first supported the war in Vietnam. But once the
statistics of the dead became visible human beings--once they saw not only
the
body bags of young GIs piling up by the tens of thousands but also the
images of the napalmed children, the burning huts, the massacred families at
My
Lai--shock and indignation fueled a national movement to end the war.
I do believe that if people could see the consequences of the bombing
campaign as vividly as we were all confronted with the horrifying photos in
the wake
of September 11, if they saw on television night after night the blinded and
maimed children, the weeping parents of Afghanistan, they might ask: Is this
the way to combat terrorism?
Surely it is time, half a century after Hiroshima, to embrace a universal
morality, to think of all children, everywhere, as our own.
Howard Zinn is the author, most recently, of Terrorism and War, forthcoming
from Seven Stories Press (2002).
2002 The Nation Company, L.P.
###
Email
Share This Article With Your Friends
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental,
political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice
issues,
etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In
accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information go
to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your
own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner.
Common Dreams
NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the
progressive community.
Home |
Newswire |
About Us |
Donate
|
Sign-Up
../privacy
Copyrighted 1997-2001
www.commondreams.org
A 'Cookie-Free' Website
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Jan 27 2002 - 17:25:57 EST