Hello, I though folks would be interested in this note I just received. my
best, roz
GAG ORDER LIFTED; INDEPENDENT MEDIA CENTER N FREE SPEECH BATTLE IN WAKE OF
FBI /SECRET SERVICE VISIT
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
SEATTLE INDEPENDENT MEDIA CENTER
27 APRIL 2001
CONTACT: Seattle Independent Media Center 206.262.0721
On the evening of Saturday, April 21, a day during which tens of thousands
demonstrated against the FTAA in the streets of Quebec City, the Independent
Media Center in Seattle was served with a sealed court order by two FBI
agents and an agent of the US Secret Service. The terms of the sealed order
prevented IMC volunteers from publicizing its terms; volunteers immediately
began discussions with legal counsel to amend the order. This morning, April
27, Magistrate Judge Monica Benton issued an amended order, freeing us to
discuss the situation without the threat of being held in contempt.
The original order, also issued by Judge Benton, directed the IMC to supply
the FBI with "all user connection logs" for April 20 and 21st from a web
server occupying an IP address which the Secret Service believed belonged to
the IMC. The order stated that this was part of an "ongoing criminal
investigation" into acts that could constitute violations of Canadian law,
specifically theft and mischief. IMC legal counsel David Sobel, of the
Electronic Privacy Information Center, comments: "As the U.S. Supreme Court
has recognized, the First Amendment protects the right to communicate
anonymously with the press and for political purposes. An order compelling
the disclosure of information identifying an indiscriminately large number
of users of a website devoted to political discourse raises very serious
constitutional issues. To provide the same protection to the press and
anonymous sources in the Internet world as with more traditional media, the
Government must be severely limited in its ability to demand their Internet
identity--their "Internet Protocol addresses." A federal statute already
requires that such efforts against the press be approved by the Attorney
General, and only where essential and after alternatives have been
exhausted. There is no suggestion that these standards were met here.
The sealed court order also directed the IMC not to disclose "the existence
of this Application or Order, or the existence of this investigation, unless
or until ordered by this court." Such a prior restraint on a media
organization goes to the heart of the First Amendment. Ironically, the
Seattle Post-Intelligencer learned about the existence of the order from
"federal sources," suggesting that the purpose of the gag order was simply
to allow the government to spin the issue its way.
The order did not specify what acts were being investigated, and the Secret
Service agent acknowledged that the IMC itself was not suspected of criminal
activity. No violation of US law was alleged. It is not clear whether
federal law allows the Attorney General ever to approve such an
investigation of US press entities to facilitate a foreign investigation.
According to IMC counsel Lee Tien of the Electronic Frontier Foundation,
"This kind of fishing expedition is another in a long line of overbroad and
onerous attempts to chill political speech and activism. Back in 1956,
Alabama tried to force the NAACP to give up its membership lists -- but the
Supreme Court stopped them. This order to IMC, even without the 'gag,' is a
threat to free speech, free association, and privacy."
Responding to questions from IMC volunteers, the agents claimed that their
investigation concerned the source of either one or two postings which, they
said, had been posted to an IMC newswire early Saturday morning. These
posts, according to the agents, contained documents stolen from a Canadian
government agency, including classified information related to the travel
itinerary of George W. Bush (who was at that time in Quebec City,
participating in Summit of the Americas meetings). Agents claimed that the
Secret Service was notified of the existence of such posts by a tip from an
(unnamed) major commercial news network.
The agents were unable to provide URL addresses or titles for the postings
they described. Additionally, the court order contained a non-working IP
address, rather than an address assigned to any of the IMC sites. IMC
volunteers nevertheless were able to identify two articles posted to the
Montreal IMC which partially matched the agents' incomplete description.
These articles, posted first in French and then in English translations
(http://montreal.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=505, 514 and 515),
contain sections of documents purportedly stolen from a Quebec City police
car during Friday night anti-FTAA demonstrations; the documents detail
police strategies for hindering protesters' mass action. It does not appear
that any materials were posted to any IMC site containing Bush1s travel
plans.
Although the agents were concerned with only two posts, the court order
demands "all user connections logs" for a 48-hour period, which would
include individual IP addresses for every person who posted materials to or
visited the IMC site during the FTAA protests. IMC legal counsel Nancy
Chang, of the Center for Constitutional Rights, comments that "the overbroad
sweep of the information demanded by the FBI raises the disturbing question
of whether the order is calculated to discourage association with the IMC."
The agents arrived at the IMC around 7pm. Seattle IMC volunteers had been
busy all afternoon gathering regional IMC coverage of FTAA protests underway
in Seattle and in Blaine, Washington, and coordinating coverage with other
sites on the IMC network. Several visitors were also in the IMC at the time,
using public computers.. While agents were speaking with one staff
volunteer, another began making telephone calls in an effort to contact
legal counsel. After the agents left, volunteers discussed the court order's
gag provision, and began recontacting the handful of people who had already
been called, in order to make sure that the terms of the court order would
not be violated before legal counsel had time to appraise the situation.
Initial attempts were made to contain news of the FBI/Secret Service visit;
however, a few details of the story were soon leaked via a partially
accurate report broadcast on the Vermont IMC internet radio stream. Soon the
Seattle IMC was flooded with phone calls requesting information about what
quickly began to be described as an "FBI raid," and speculations began to
spread rapidly across the open-publishing newswires of various IMCs.
For about three hours, a network of IMC technology volunteers attempted to
comply with the court order by removing such posts from the Seattle IMC and
other major IMC sites as they appeared. This had the unfortunate effect of
seemingly confirming the worst suspicions of independent journalists who
posted brief articles announcing or speculating about mysterious and
terrible things going on at the Seattle IMC, then finding their posts
removed from view minutes later. Volunteers called off this clumsy attempt
at rumor control around midnight, when it became clear that removing of
posts was only serving to fan the flames of rumor, and that in any case the
story had already spread beyond the confines of the IMC network. In acting
to remove these posts, IMC volunteers were motivated by fear of violating
the court order's gag provision even before legal counsel had had a chance
to review the document. We regret the feelings of confusion and
disempowerment which many users of the IMC sites experienced due to Saturday
night's blackout of postings on this topic, and the general frustration
caused by the gag order.
Since the incident occurred, several persistent, yet false, rumors have
taken shape; some of these found their way into coverage published in
Monday's Seattle Post-Intelligencer and other commercial media. We can now
dispel some of the more common of these: No search warrant was served on IMC
in connection with the court order, and nobody connected to the Seattle IMC
has been arrested. No equipment or logs have been seized; the agents' visit
was not a "raid."
Now, free from restrictive court orders, the Seattle IMC will be able to
cover this important story as it continues to unfold.
The Seattle Independent Media Center was launched in Fall 1999 to provide
immediate, authentic, grassroots coverage of protests against the WTO. Just
a year and a half later, the IMC network has reached around the world, with
dozens of sites scattered across six continents. IMCs are autonomously
organized and administered, but share collective organizational principles
and certain technological resources. Each IMC's news coverage centers upon
its open-publishing newswire, an innovative and democratizing system
allowing anyone with access to an Internet connection to become a
journalist, reporting on events from his or her own perspective rather than
being forced to rely on the narrow range of views presented by
corporate-owned mainstream media sources.
During last weekend's widespread protests against a proposed Free Trade Area
of the Americas, many IMC sites collaborated to produce comprehensive
coverage of demonstrations taking place in Quebec City and Sao Paulo, as
well as solidarity protests in cities across the U.S. and along the Mexican
and Canadian borders. The breadth and depth of coverage produced by the
IMC's global network eclipsed that of many corporate media outlets.
The Seattle IMC remains committed to its mission: "The Independent Media
Center is a grassroots organization committed to using media production and
distribution as a tool for promoting social and economic justice. It is our
goal to further the self-determination of people under-represented in media
production and content, and to illuminate and analyze local and global
issues that impact ecosystems, communities and individuals. We seek to
generate alternatives to the biases inherent in the corporate media
controlled by profit, and to identify and create positive models for a
sustainable and equitable society."
CONTACT:
Seattle Independent Media Center
1415 3rd Ave.
Seattle, WA, 98101
206.262.0721
206.262.9905 fax
David Burman, IMC counsel
Perkins Coie LLP
1201 Third Ave., 40th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101
206.583.8888
Alan Korn, Attorney with the National Lawyers Guild
Center on Democratic Communication
415.362.5700
David Sobel, General Counsel
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Suite 200, 1718 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20009
202.483.1140
Nancy Chang, Senior Litigation Attorney
Center for Constitutional Rights
666 Broadway, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10012
212.614.6420
Lee Tien, Senior Staff Attorney
Electronic Frontier Foundation
454 Shotwell Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415.436.9333
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Apr 28 2001 - 22:14:30 EDT