Re: [sixties-l] Re: Nader Fiasco

From: Tony Edmonds (00aoedmonds@bsuvc.bsu.edu)
Date: 11/29/00

Next message: Tony Edmonds: "Re: [sixties-l] Re: Hitchins on Nader"

Previous message: Jeffrey Blankfort: "Re: [sixties-l] Nader Fiasco"
Maybe in reply to: Richard Schneirov: "[sixties-l] Re: Nader Fiasco"
Next in thread: Carrol Cox: "Re: [sixties-l] Re: Nader Fiasco"
Next in thread: Sorrento95@aol.com: "Re: [sixties-l] Re: Nader Fiasco"
Reply: Carrol Cox: "Re: [sixties-l] Re: Nader Fiasco"
Reply: Tom Nagy, Ph.D.: "[sixties-l] Ok, Demos & Republ. = Only (!) 1/2 a Hitler!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Carrol Cox wrote:

>We have no friends in either of the parties. To speak of being
>between them is as silly as to speak of being between Hitler
>and Goebbels.

Isn't this analogy pretty strained, indeed insulting.  Whatever their flaws,
Bush and Gore are no Hitler and Stalin!

Tony Edmonds
Ball State University

Next message: Tony Edmonds: "Re: [sixties-l] Re: Hitchins on Nader"
Previous message: Jeffrey Blankfort: "Re: [sixties-l] Nader Fiasco"
Maybe in reply to: Richard Schneirov: "[sixties-l] Re: Nader Fiasco"
Next in thread: Carrol Cox: "Re: [sixties-l] Re: Nader Fiasco"
Next in thread: Sorrento95@aol.com: "Re: [sixties-l] Re: Nader Fiasco"
Reply: Carrol Cox: "Re: [sixties-l] Re: Nader Fiasco"
Reply: Tom Nagy, Ph.D.: "[sixties-l] Ok, Demos & Republ. = Only (!) 1/2 a Hitler!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 11/29/00 EST