[sixties-l] Re; Hitchins on Nader

• Previous message: BrentLance@aol.com: "[sixties-l] The election viewpoint from a former ABC foreign correspondent"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I distrust the use of a complicated anaysis to disprove the obvious. What 
the Nader candidacy did was take over 78,000 votes in Florida. If Nader had
not been on the ballot, Gore would be president. Now, one may argue about
whether that would be good or bad for the country. But it would be true. For
Nader and/or Hitchins to dispute this is beyond my comprehension. I am
trying to make a point about thinking and analysis - how they can be used so
cleverly to evade the obvious.
-- Many Blessings
Neil





>

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>            

• Next message: Jeffrey Apfel: "[sixties-l] another imagine that!"
• Previous message: BrentLance@aol.com: "[sixties-l] The election viewpoint from a former ABC foreign correspondent"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 11/19/00 EST