[sixties-l] U.S. has not learned from Vietnam

From: radman (resist@best.com)
Date: 10/19/00

  • Next message: radman: "[sixties-l] Fwd: Corporate Globalization Is Giving Rise To a New Wave of Campus Activism"

    Former defense secretary says U.S. has not learned from Vietnam
    October 17, 2000
    By Julia Levy
    The Dartmouth, Dartmouth College
    Stepping through the door of the Rockefeller Center's Morrison Commons 
    yesterday at first seemed like a journey back in time to an age when "dress 
    down" did not apply to work days and when the United States was still 
    saving the world from communism.
    There sat Vietnam-era Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, who has been 
    called the "architect" of the waras well as James Blight, a Brown 
    international relations professor and Robert Brigham, a Vassar history 
    Despite McNamara's presence, still powerful at age 84 --- it was quickly 
    obvious that there had been massive changes since the 1960s.
    The 21st century McNamara pounded his fist on the table when he talked 
    about his actions as Secretary of Defense.
    He used strong language explaining that he should have "forced" the 
    National Security Council to evaluate the U.S. role in Vietnam before he 
    left Lyndon B. Johnson's administration in early 1968. He said he should 
    not have allowed history to take its course without pausing and initiating 
    thoughtful intervention.
    "Will the dominoes fall?" he said the NSC should have asked itself. "Will 
    that seriously and adversely affect events across the world?"
    "And assuming that our security would have been affected, was it possible 
    to militarily win the war?"
    The 21st century McNamara who says he has learned his Vietnam lessons, 
    maintains that the United States as a nation still has a long way to go on 
    this front.
    Regarding the current situation in Yugoslavia he asked, "Is the world 
    better off? Are the Kosovars better off?" He noted that the first 
    requirement of physicians is to do no harm, and he wondered if the United 
    States has met that requirement in Yugoslavia.
    In terms of Israel, he answered with a flat out "no" to whether or not U.S. 
    policy makers are following the lessons of Vietnam as they facilitate the 
    negotiations that are currently underway in Egypt.
    He said America must continue asking itself whether it is engaging in 
    "arrogant unilateralism" or whether it is working as the responsible leader 
    of a globalized world community.
    Although McNamara's newest book"Argument Without End: In Search of Answers 
    to the Vietnam Tragedy"which he co-authored with Blight and Brigham, hit 
    the presses 30 years after the North Vietnamese claimed victory, he said it 
    sets out workable solutions for modern policy makers who want to avoid past 
    mistakes. The book is based on a series of discussions with American and 
    Vietnamese participants in the Vietnam War and highlights the crucial 
    junctures when the war could have been terminated or avoided.
    These admissions of missed opportunity are not new fodder for McNamara. In 
    his 1995 book "In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam" he 
    shocked the nation when he acknowledged, "We of the Kennedy and Johnson 
    administrations who participated in the decisions on Vietnam acted 
    according to what we thought were the principles and traditions of this 
    nation ... Yet we were wrong, terribly wrong."
    Some critics have called McNamara's apology and Cold War revelations too 
    late; others have hailed his books as the first step towards understanding 
    the past.
    McNamara's suggestions include learning about the mindset of the 
    opposition, communicating at high levels, only employing power 
    multilaterally and acknowledging that not every conflict can be resolved.
    In the process of writing "Argument Without End" McNamara, Blight and 
    Brigham approached oral history from a unique angle. Instead of setting 
    officials up with tape recorders to tell their stories, they initiated 
    discussions between high-ranking officials, who had been close to the 
    decision making process on both sides, and scholars of the war's history.
    Blight said about 95 percent of the government officials approached chose 
    not to participate in the study.
    He explained, "close document-anchored interrogation is difficult enough 
    for scholars" but it is even more difficult when history makers must sit 
    down and analyze whether their policies and ideologies were based on "fact 
    or fantasy."
    Blight explained this prospect is a hard one when most people have not 
    changed their views on the Vietnam War "one iota" since the 1960s.
    "Bob McNamara is one of the few who asked himself whether the assessments 
    made were accurate," he said.
    Blight, who created the methodology the team employed, and Brigham, a noted 
    historian, agreed that their approach was more historically sound than a 
    straight oral history. They said they had the benefit of incorporating 
    declassified material and chronology with the memories of the people who 
    participated in the policy-making as well as the input of scholars.
    McNamara affirmed that he continues to hold the skepticism towards oral 
    histories that he stated in a 1975 oral history for the Johnson library.
    At the time he stated, "I'm ill prepared for it in the sense that my memory 
    is poor in respect to past events in which I participated. Moreover, I find 
    it very difficult, with the best of intentions to separate my personal 
    feelings and judgements from a professional appraisal of the merit of the 
    The trio agreed that their particular variety of oral history is an 
    extremely sound form of history, and denied that it is simply a case of 
    history makers attempting to rewrite their own historical events.
    "You should draw, you must draw, lessons from the past," Brigham said. 
    "Vietnam is the case study of the 20th century. There are practical answers 
    ... the [study's participants] are adding to those."

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 10/19/00 EDT