John McMillian writes: "I'd love to hear what others on this list think about the current possibilities for an even broader-based movement." I respond in perspective of my separate response to the historical context of his query -- in which I discuss, or at least allude to, the way a constellation of cultural influences shaped and enabled our vision of ourselves in action as a movement in the New Left. An analogous process may be empowering an emergent movement now, as John suggests, with at least onel difference worth noting. More clearly than the diverse influences on my generation that John cites, much of the present constellation influencing youth derives from what may perhaps be thought of, at this distance, as a single source -- the conjoint youth-political/countercultural//ethnic/racial movement of the Sixties. Though all sorts of "splitters" may contest this taxonomic description on valid grounds and scold me for briing a lumpen "lumper," I believe there is equally deep and coherent ground for understanding these developments as an organic complex. Its presumptive integrity seemingly shattered into thirty independent vectors during the Seventies, which have since developed (or mutated, in a mutating era) into the fertile constellation of influences ---from feminism, veganism, deep ecology, shallow environmentalism, pacifism, anarchism, "alternative" music, paganism, organic farming, gay/lesbianism, gender morphing, empathogenic drugs, "new age" entrepreneurship, Internet anarchy, resurgent and service unionism, consumer action, police control movements, every ethnic/racial stream, and so much else -- that impact the present environment of youth culture. This current array may seem merely as diverse, if considerably more complex, than the array we encountered in my youth. But I think also that the nascent integrity of sense to be made from it may be more advanced for some youth now than it was for us at similar stage. For though the impulse of the Sixties split into independent vectors, there has ever since been among many of them a sense of implicit relation and of a realizable harmony, lying somewhere beyond the engrossment of each vector's immediate affairs, in a direction pointed vaguely but insistently by the piecemeal efforts, increasing noteably during the past decade, to bring together this stream and that one of progressive activism's development. What amalgam may be made of these together must (mecessarily) be left to those who will be shaped by integrating these influences in growing up. Despite all signs of the gathering "virtual tyranny" of corporate culture, I am hopeful; for these kids have pep, and more sophistication in a more complex surround than we had at their age. Michael Rossman <mrossman@igc.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 10/11/00 EDT