Re: [sixties-l] Re: sixties-l-Robert Scheer Sells Out

From: David Horowitz (Dhorowitz@earthlink.net)
Date: Fri Aug 25 2000 - 16:59:17 CUT

  • Next message: sixties@lists.village.virginia.edu: "[sixties-l] research help needed"

    I think Jezer has Groucho and Karl mixed up. The actual quote is "I wouldn't want
    to be a member of any club that would have me as a member."

    Marty Jezer wrote:

    > Thanks Carl for saying what I wanted to say.
    >
    > I've not followed Scheer's career with the LA Times, but let's assume he's
    > moved towards the center and that I would disagree with him on five or six
    > political positions. Does that make him a sell-out? No! We just disagree
    > on certain issues and hopefully we'd work together on the issues we go
    > agree on.
    >
    > People on the left still read people out of "the party" over every petty
    > disagreement. With maybe 5% of the population with us we continually strive
    > to get down to the 4% who are the purist (rather than striving to make it
    > 5, 6, 10, 50%). And when someone breaks with us on a particular issue, we
    > denounce them personally (he's sold out") instead of engaging them.
    >
    > Recall the 1980's when we were all anti-interventionists, fighting against
    > U.S. intervention in Central America. Our best and bravest allies were
    > priests and nuns in the Catholic Church!
    > Fuck purity and savor the contradictions!
    >
    > Marx's observation that "I wouldn't join any party that would have me as a
    > member" seems to hold true on the left today, just as it did in the past.
    >
    > Marty Jezer
    >
    > At 02:15 PM 8/10/2000 -0500, you wrote:
    > >DEAR JEFFERY,
    > >
    > >FROM ONE NADER SUPPORTER TO ANOTHER:
    > >
    > >TO WRITE THAT BOB SCHEER IS "NO LESS A SELL-OUT" THAN DAVID HOROWITZ IS JUST
    > >PLAIN IGNORANT. IT IS ALSO THE KIND OF LOW LEVEL ATTACK THAT IS A PART OF
    > >THE LEFT'S PAST WE CAN AND SHOULD DO WITHOUT.
    > >
    > >CARL BLOICE
    > >
    > >-----Original Message-----
    > >From: owner-sixties-l@lists.village.virginia.edu
    > >[mailto:owner-sixties-l@lists.village.virginia.edu]On Behalf Of Jeffrey
    > >Blankfort
    > >Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 8:40 AM
    > >To: sixties-l@lists.village.virginia.edu
    > >Subject: [sixties-l] Re: sixties-l-Robert Scheer Sells Out
    > >
    > >
    > >I picked up the National Edition of the LA Times yesterday to see what
    > >it had to say about the choice of Lieberman and what do I find but a
    > >column by Bob Scheer attacking Gore's choice but for the wrong reasons:
    > >that Lieberman "betrayed" Clinton.
    > >
    > >Scheer, for those who don't remember, was one of the leading voices
    > >against the Vietnam War in the SF Bay Area, and even ran for Senate. He
    > >edited Ramparts during its glory days. He was an early supporter of the
    > >Panthers and lived in a communal household with Tom Hayden, unsubtlely
    > >called, "The Red Family." Since those days he has drifted toward the
    > >center, accompanied by a cushy salary from the LA Times, as an op-ed
    > >writer, and as an interviewer for Playboy. Since Clinton's election, he
    > >has become an unapologetic PR man for the White House, managing to
    > >overlook all those issues which would have engaged and enraged the
    > >Scheer of the Sixties.
    > >
    > >Scheer, far more pernicious and dangerous than his old colleague at
    > >Ramparts, David Horowitz, and no less a sell-out, writes that Lieberman
    > >should be "boasting about the record of the Clinton-Gore years...The
    > >fact is, Clinton has been a great president, presiding over eight years
    > >of unprecedented prosperity and progress towards world peace."
    > >
    > >This from someone who has completely expunged the radical past from his
    > >web site (the past which led to the position where he could sell his
    > >soul to the LA Times and could even afford to sleep in the Brooks
    > >Brothers fashions he is never seen without).
    > >
    > >In differing with Scheer on Clinton's record, I don't need, for this
    > >list, to bring up the details of such domestic issues as so-called
    > >welfare reform, the "effective death penalty and counter-terrorism act"
    > >which has been the highlight of the greatest attack on our civil
    > >liberties by any recent president, the elevation of incarceration levels
    > >through the phony anti-drug war, and the trade agreements and support of
    > >merger-mania which has widened the gap between rich and poor to
    > >third-world proportions, nor to the international issues such as the
    > >genocidal sanctions against Iraq and the promotion of the Star Wars
    > >missile program that threatens to escalate the tensions between the US
    > >and Russia and China, etc.
    > >
    > >Actually, I just remembered that Sweet Old Bob (or just the initials, as
    > >I prefer) interviewed Nixon before he died or perhaps he was writing
    > >immediately afterward, but then, too, he praised Nixon as one of
    > >America's great presidents.
    > >
    > >Jeff Blankfort
    >
    > --
    > Marty Jezer * 22 Prospect St. * Brattleboro, VT 05301 * p/f 802 257-5644
    >
    > Author:
    > Stuttering: A Life Bound Up in Words (Basic Books)
    > Abbie Hoffman: American Rebel (Rutgers University Press)
    > The Dark Ages: Life in the USA, 1945-1960 (South End Press)
    > Rachel Carson [American Women of Achievement Series] (Chelsea House)
    > Check out my web page: http://www.sover.net/~mjez
    > To subscribe to my Friday commentary, simply request to be put on my
    > mailing list. It's free!



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 28 2000 - 08:48:08 CUT