[sixties-l] Re: Sixties-1 War and Male Bonding

From: Jeffrey Blankfort (jab@tucradio.org)
Date: Sat Jul 08 2000 - 02:11:38 CUT

  • Next message: Jeffrey Blankfort: "Re: [sixties-l] Re POW-MIA post"

    I read this yesterday from Mumia and then this morning there was a story
    in the NY Times about the most recent attack by a US soldier on an
    Okinawan young woman. Buried deep in the article was this sentence:

    "Japanese and Western historians have said that in the aftermath of
    World War II, American troops raped thousands of Okinawan women without reprisals."

    One thing that seems to define all conquering and occupying armies is
    their predilection to rape defenseless women. While agreeing with
    Mumia's statement, I would say that the phenomenon is not limited
    to the US.

    Jeff Blankfort

    FROM MUMIA ABU-JAMAL
    SNATCH AND GRAB IN CENTRAL PARK
    Column Written 6/26/2000
    Mumia Abu-Jamal
    All Rights Reserved
    "Next to God, we are indebted to women, first for life
    itself, and then for making it worth having." - Mary McLeod Bethune
    (1875-1955)

    The spectacle of hordes of young Black and Puerto Rican men,
    wetting, grabbing and stripping young women in New York's famed Central Park
    in the waning hours of the Puerto Rican Day Parade, sent shock waves through
    the city, across the nation, and indeed, around the world.
    Almost as baffling was the lack of response by police, who told
    weeping, terrified, angry and barely-clothed women that they couldn't leave
    their posts, that they didn't have radios on them, or directing them to fill
    out complaints.

    This frenzied attack on over 40 young women would've been denied or
    ignored were it not for the power of videotape.
    Although for most of us a natural reaction to this unhealthy
    spectacle would be shock, denial, or even disbelief, another response, one
    informed by history, might have been more appropriate: it's logical, and
    therefore, foreseeable.
    Undoubtedly, a number of readers are asking serious questions at
    this point: "Logical? What?! Jamal, you must be crazy!" What is
    crazy is the deep and abiding hatred, fear, and envy of women that lies
    in the
    recesses of the American psyche.

    This resistance to the unleashing of female power is deeply rooted
    in the West, as revealed in the motto promoted by the Roman Catholic Church
    in the 12th and 13th century: "Woman is a temple built over a sewer." The
    infamous book Malleus Maleficarum ("The Witches' Hammer," publ. 1487)
    led to the torture, death and damning of thousands of women in Europe,
    in the name of witch-hunting. The name, Salem, proves this wasn't just
    a European
    phenomenon.

    "Ok, Jamal - What's this stuff got to do with what happened in
    Central Park, man?"

    America's history is a history of the domination of women, and where
    official domination is not allowed, unofficial ways of subordination
    will be found.

    What happened in Central Park in June of 2000 was not "clean fun,"
    "wild boys," or an open form of erotic play. What happened was a mass
    attack on women, to humiliate them, and to subordinate them. It was an act
    designed to discipline them by instilling terror in them. It was an act of
    veiled hatred, that was seconded by the cavalier treatment the women
    received at the hands of the cops. It was an act motivated more by gender
    dynamics, than racial dynamics. But, there was another dynamic at work:
    that of mass psychology.

    Psychiatrists Frantz G. Alexander and Sheldon T. Selesnic, in The
    History of Psychiatry (1966) cited the work of French psychologist Gustave
    Le Bon, who wrote La Psychologie des Foules (1895) (The Psychology of
    Fools), for the idea that conscience is naturally diminished by mobs:
    ... Because the voice of the individual conscience is silent
    in a group. All that has been repressed, all that violates the
    standards of the conscience, is free to appear uninhibited. (p.204).
    What had been socially repressed? The deep-seated misogyny of the West, or
    hatred of women.

    It was lessons well-learned by teenaged boys, who were modeling not
    only disrespectful, and misogynistic videos, movies, and TV shows, but also
    a political culture that has, as one of its central themes, the hatred,
    demonization, and destabilization of poor women, especially women of color.
    It may not have been nice, but it was logical, in a society erected
    on domination.

    It is time to change the lessons we teach kids, by radically
    transforming society itself.
    MAJ 2000
    ==================================>



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 08 2000 - 20:21:38 CUT