Since I was not born until 56 I cannot contribute anything of a first
hand nature to this discussion. However, after reading the various
threads from this newsgroup in which Mr. Howowitz was involved I feel
compelled to comment.
One side of the argument leaned rather heavily on the facts, whereas the
other relied almost totally on casting aspersions.
One side seemed to get more envigorated, and energized with each new
reply, whereas the other side was awfully prone to whining in the
direction of the moderator, and stomping out of the group in protest.
Don't let the door hit you!
In the final analysis... There is also one major difference between Mr.
Horowitz, and myself. He is far more polite than I would have been
under similar circumstances.
I am not anywhere near as capable a polemist as he, but that just makes
me fight harder. You folks have lost the ability to engage in a
meaningful debate because you spend all your time in newsgroups like
this one engaging in meaningless self-glorifying prattle.
For a time David Horowitz let some air into this stuffy (is that a
brown, and yellow haze?) group, but as with dogs who have grown too old
to entertain the possibility of learning an occasional new trick, your
responses amounted to little more than a nervous soiling of the carpet.
Now back to your regularly scheduled drivel...
Note: Mr. Horowitz has admonished anyone who wishes to respond to do so
with "dignity, and decorum." However, as I may have failed to meet that
standard, please direct any ensuing flames directly to me at:
I take full, and sole responsibility for my rants, and encourage anyone
to "Himme with your best shot... Fire Away!"
I like a challenge.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 16 2000 - 08:48:51 CUT