Discussion paper again

From: Daniel Pitti (dpitti@virginia.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 05 2001 - 08:12:22 EST

  • Next message: Daniel Pitti: "Fwd: Jerry McDonough's Visit"

    SDS Discussion Paper
    November 5, 2001

    To date, the SDS-Policy Committee has been considering the various
    activities that constitute "collecting." In other words, what does it mean
    to collect in a library? In this regard, we have identified the following
    broad categories of activities involved in collecting

    § Discovery
    § Selection
    § Acquiring
    § Preserving
    § Description, Access, and Control
    § Deselecting

    We have covered all of these with regard to traditional collecting, but
    have now paused with the analysis of digital selecting, as we have
    concluded that the evaluation of "usability" within the context of the
    digital appears in itself to embody many of the challenges that digital
    works present library collecting.

    Control and Responsibility

    The essential charge of the Policy Committee is to recommend policy for
    library collecting of digital works. These recommendations will necessarily
    need to make recommendations concerning what it means to collect digital
    works. In making this determination, it will be necessary, I think, to
    establish a set of ideal objectives, and then to evaluate, with the
    technical committee, the extent to which these objectives can be met within
    the constraints of the current experiment. Following the determination of
    realistic objectives, appropriate policies that will facilitate meeting the
    objectives will need to be determined.

    An essential consideration in determining realistic objectives will be the
    extent to which we can control what is collected. In order to carry out the
    activities necessary to meet objectives in a reliable, consistent way, we
    will need to control works collected. Such control need not be thorough in
    every possible detail, but at a minimum must be exercised over those work
    characteristics needed to meet the objectives.

    What follows, is a list of problem areas in the digital library
    environment. It is offered as a starting point for discussion. The areas
    are interrelated, and thus the separation is not to be considered normative.

    Work Identification and Integrity

    § How does one define and identify a work? Texts, images, relational
    databases, models, geographic information systems, interrelated media.
    § What role does the creator have in identifying works?
    § What role does the library have in identifying a work?
    § Can the library redefine what is and is not a work?
    § Does the work comprise one or more works (sub-works)?
    § Are sub-works collectable independent of the containing work? Does
    the creator or library determine this? What rights does the creator have
    in determining this?

    Collecting and Control

    § Is a work considered collected if the library only links to it?
    § Or is a work considered collected when it takes control over the
    file or files comprising the work?

    Copyright

    § Is all or part of the digital work explicitly protected by creator
    copyright?
    § Is all or part of the digital work explicitly protected by
    copyright belonging to someone other than the creator?
    § Does the creator have digital rights?
    § Are the rights transferable?
    § What is the library's responsibility with respect to tracking and
    enforcing copyright?

    Authenticity: Intrinsic/Fungible Value

    § Does the work as a whole have intrinsic value, that is, both the
    data (information content) and the data behaviors (look and feel)? [A good
    example of this is the William Blake Archive]
    § Or, can the data be collected independently of the data behaviors,
    and new, library determined behaviors associated with it? [A library
    catalog might be a good example of this]
    § Does the creator, publisher, or library make this determination? Or
    is it negotiated with the controlling creator or publisher?

    Persistence

    § Is the data comprising the work based on (open, public) standards?
    § Are the data behaviors based on standards?
    § Are all files comprising the work controlled and transferable by
    the creator?
    § Are links between resources comprising the work based on standards?
    Are links embedded in the data representation? Or are links maintained
    independently?
    § If a work is ongoing, is the library responsible for providing real
    time access where this is critical to the utility of the work?
    § If links to an ongoing work exist in other collected works, is the
    library responsible for maintaining versions of the ongoing work in order
    to maintain the integrity of the link? For works not collected to works
    collected?
    § If a work is collected in successive editions, is the library
    responsible for persistent identification of these works (and sub-works,
    and work sub-addresses) when there are links to them in other works under
    collection control? Or in works outside of collection control?
    § When successive editions of a work are collected, are editions
    interrelated? If successive editions of works comprising sub-works are
    collected, are sub-works interrelated?

    Editions/Versions

    § Is the work complete and static?
    § Is the work ongoing?
    § Is the value of the work dependent on real time access?
    § Can the work be collected in successive editions?

      Bibliographic, Administrative, and Structural Control

    § What are the possible relationships between works/intellectual
    content and files?
    § What responsibility does the library have for providing
    intellectual control? File control? Maintain the relations between
    intellectual and file control?
    § Is the library responsible for providing descriptive cataloging for
    all works collected (involves both intellectual description, as well as
    "physical description," that is file description).
    § When works contain descriptive data (metadata or cataloging)
    supplied by the creator, will all, some, or none of this data be accepted
    for inclusion in the library catalog? If some, what criteria will be used
    to make the decision?
    § Who is responsible for administrative data? Structural data? What
    is the difference, if any, between structural data and links between two or
    more files in a work (see persistence above)?

    ----------
    Daniel V. Pitti Project Director
    Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities
    Alderman Library University of Virginia Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
    Phone: 434 924-6594 Fax: 434 982-2363 Email: dpitti@Virginia.edu
    http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu
    AREA CODE IS NEW EFFECTIVE JUNE 2001



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Nov 05 2001 - 08:12:36 EST