Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 21, No. 329.
Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
www.kcl.ac.uk/schools/humanities/cch/research/publications/humanist.html
www.princeton.edu/humanist/
Submit to: humanist_at_princeton.edu
[1] From: "Joris van Zundert" <joris.van.zundert_at_gmail.com> (12)
Subject: Re: 21.325 pigeonholes (or cages)
[2] From: Neven
Jovanovic <neven.jovanovic_at_ffzg.hr> (5)
Subject: Re: 21.325 pigeonholes (or cages)
--[1]------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:47:47 +0000
From: "Joris van Zundert" <joris.van.zundert_at_gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 21.325 pigeonholes (or cages)
Dear Willard,
I intersected Bentkowska's and Tannenbaum's suggestions:
"Humanities should a.o. train students to use the power of computing to
enable inquiries that by hand and brain alone would
be too difficult or time-consuming to be feasible, thus opening major
new vistas on our disciplines and ourselves."
That makes perfect sense to me.
Cheers,
Joris
-- Mr. Joris J. van Zundert (MA) Huygens Institute Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences --[2]------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:48:37 +0000 From: Neven Jovanovic <neven.jovanovic_at_ffzg.hr> Subject: Re: 21.325 pigeonholes (or cages) My take on Willard's definition, combined with the Google approach: DH is: trying to explain art (and literature, and philosophy, and music...) to a computer. Neven Neven Jovanovic Zagreb, CroatiaReceived on Thu Nov 01 2007 - 02:02:47 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Nov 01 2007 - 02:02:49 EST