18.300 skimming

From: Humanist Discussion Group (by way of Willard McCarty willard.mccarty_at_kcl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:56:48 +0100

               Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 18, No. 300.
       Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                   www.kcl.ac.uk/humanities/cch/humanist/
                        www.princeton.edu/humanist/
                     Submit to: humanist_at_princeton.edu

   [1] From: Suzana Sukovic <suzana.sukovic_at_uts.edu.au> (52)
         Subject: Re: 18.297 skimming? expressive drift?

   [2] From: Norman Hinton <hinton_at_springnet1.com> (2)
         Subject: Re: 18.297 skimming? expressive drift?

--[1]------------------------------------------------------------------
         Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:35:58 +0100
         From: Suzana Sukovic <suzana.sukovic_at_uts.edu.au>
         Subject: Re: 18.297 skimming? expressive drift?

>--[1]------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 07:47:23 +0100
> From: Caterina Caracciolo <caterina_at_localhost.localdomain>
> >
>
>Dear all,
>
>I am looking for material concerning the process of skimming a text, either
>when reading on-paper, or on-line.
>
>It seems to me that a forward skimming is easier to perform and more
>"reader-friendly" than a backward skimming, at least for those languages
>that are written from left to right and from top to bottom.
>
>If so, when assessing the readability of an excerpt from a text, documents
>starting slightly too early (with respect to the relevant part) should be
>preferred over documents starting slightly too late, since the latter imply
>a backward skimming.
>
>Obviously, not only the direction of the skimming, but also the "amount" of
>text to skim, have an impact on the readability of the text.
>
>Can anyone point me to studies on these issues, or let me know your opinion
>on them?
>
>Best,
>
>Caterina Caracciolo
>
> Informatics Institute, Uni of Amsterdam | P: +31 20 525 5355
> Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ Amsterdam (NL) | F: +31 20 525 7490
>http://www.science.uva.nl/~caterina

Miriam Schcolnik - "A study of reading with dedicated e-readers", available
from http://www.planetebook.com/downloads/schcolnik.pdf

Cheers

Suzana Sukovic
PhD Candidate
_________________________________________
The Information Program Area
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
University of Technology, Sydney

suzana.sukovic_at_uts.edu.au

--
UTS CRICOS Provider Code:  00099F
DISCLAIMER: This email message and any accompanying attachments may contain
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient, do not
read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments.  If
you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
and delete this message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority,
states them to be the views the University of Technology Sydney. Before
opening any attachments, please check them for viruses and defects.
--[2]------------------------------------------------------------------
         Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:38:07 +0100
         From: Norman Hinton <hinton_at_springnet1.com>
         Subject: Re: 18.297 skimming? expressive drift?
Without reference to 'ease', I was taught 50 years ago that you do a better
job proofreading backwards than forwards.
Received on Thu Oct 21 2004 - 03:05:31 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Oct 21 2004 - 03:05:33 EDT