18.215 Nature debate on open access

From: Humanist Discussion Group (by way of Willard McCarty willard.mccarty_at_kcl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:04:44 +0100

               Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 18, No. 215.
       Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                   www.kcl.ac.uk/humanities/cch/humanist/
                        www.princeton.edu/humanist/
                     Submit to: humanist_at_princeton.edu

         Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:13:39 +0100
         From: "DECLAN BUTLER, NATURE" <d.butler_at_nature-france.com>
         Subject: Re: Nature Web Debate on Open Access

Dear Colleagues
I thought I'd let you know that the Nature Web focus on access wrapped up
yesterday.
http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/
I've appended the final Table of Contents below.
Best regards
Declan

Introduction
Declan Butler
Nature
19 March 2004

Experiments in publishing
 From Nature 9 September 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/34.html>The pros and
cons of Open Access
Kate Worlock
13 September 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/32.html>The orthodoxy of
Open Access
John Ewing
13 September 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/31.html>Journal
publishing: what do authors want?
Ian Rowlands, Dave Nicholas and Paul Huntingdon
13 September 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/30.html>What do
societies do with their publishing surpluses?
Christine Baldwin and Sally Morris
13 September 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/33.html>Electronic
publishing models and the public good
Bernard Rous
13 September 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/29.html>Britain decides
'open access' is still an open issue
Declan Butler
Nature
 From Nature 22 July 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/28.html>The best
business model for scholarly journals:
an economist's perspective
Mark J. McCabe and Christopher M. Snyder
16 July 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/27.html>A professional
society's take on access to the
scientific literature
Bettie Sue Masters and Judith S. Bond
8 July 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/26.html>An
evidence-based assessment of the 'author pays' model
Donald W. King and Carol Tenopir
University of Pittsburgh/Tennessee
25 June 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/25.html>PNAS and Open
Access
Nicholas R. Cozzarelli
University of California at Berkeley
25 June 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/24.html>The primacy of
authors in achieving Open Access
Peter Suber
10 June 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/23.html>Not so quiet on
a Western front
Daniel Greenstein
University of California
28 May 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/22.html>Can 'author
pays' journals compete with 'reader pays'?
T.C. Bergstrom and C.T Bergstrom
Universities of California, and Washington
20 May 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/21.html>The green and
the gold roads to Open Access
Stevan Harnad et al.
17 May 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/20.html>Can Open Access
be viable?
The Institute of Physics' experience
John Haynes
IOP Publishing Ltd
7 May 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/19.html>Do Open Access
journals have impact?
James Pringle
Thomson ISI
7 May 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/17.html>CrossRef
launches CrossRef Search, powered By Google
Ed Pentz
CrossRef
29 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/18.html>Analysing the
scientific literature in its online
context
Jon Kleinberg
Cornell University
29 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/16.html>Open Access
needs to get 'back to basics'
Leo Waaijers
SURF
23 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/15.html>Open Access
ignoring lessons of dot-com bubble
Marie Meyer
Vertilog
22 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/14.html>Is free affordable?
John B. Hawley
Journal of Clinical Investigation
15 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/13.html>Open access by
the article: an idea whose time has come?
Thomas J. Walker
University of Florida
15 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/11.html>How journals can
'realistically' boost access
Ira Mellman
Editor-in-Chief, The Journal of Cell Biology
8 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/12.html>Experimenting
with Open Access publishing
Martin Richardson and Claire Saxby
Oxford University Press
8 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/9.html>On being
scientific about science publishing
Ann Okerson
Associate University Librarian,Yale University
1 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/10.html>The myth of
'unsustainable' Open Access journals
Jan Velterop
BioMed Central
1 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/8.html>Open access and
learned Societies
Will open access prove a blessing or a curse to learned societies?
Kate Worlock
EPS
25 March 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/7.html>Why electronic
publishing means people will pay different prices
Andrew Odlyzko
Digital Technology Center, University of Minnesota
25 March 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/2.html>Open access and
not-for-profit publishers
Sally Morris
Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers
19 March 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/3.html>Open Access: yes,
no, maybe
Karen Hunter
Elsevier
19 March 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/4.html>Universities' own
electronic repositories yet to impact on Open Access
Mark Ware
Publishing Consultant
19 March 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/5.html>PLoS co-founder
defends free dissemination of peer-reviewed journals online
Patrick Brown
Public Library of Science
19 March 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/6.html>Science<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/6.html>

editor-in-chief warns of PLoS growing pains
Donald Kennedy
Science
19 March 2004

Declan Butler
European correspondent, Nature
7 rue Guy de la Brosse
75005 Paris, France
Tel: (33) 1 43 36 59 90

E-mail: d.butler_at_nature.com or
d.butler_at_nature-france.com
Nature:
http://www.nature.com/<http://www.nature.com/nature/>nature/
Received on Wed Sep 15 2004 - 03:17:43 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 15 2004 - 03:17:45 EDT