17.756 ethnography

From: Humanist Discussion Group (by way of Willard McCarty willard.mccarty@kcl.ac.uk)
Date: Fri May 07 2004 - 16:57:57 EDT

  • Next message: Humanist Discussion Group (by way of Willard McCarty

                   Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 17, No. 756.
           Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                       www.kcl.ac.uk/humanities/cch/humanist/
                            www.princeton.edu/humanist/
                         Submit to: humanist@princeton.edu

             Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 06:57:57 +0100
             From: Christine Goldbeck <cgoldie@verizon.net>
             Subject: Re: 17.752 German e-learning? ethnography? consonants in
    Turkic languages?

    I agree, Mr. McCarthy, that such ethnographic studies are important to
    humanities computing. Perhaps we could explore a working group to undertake
    some type of research on this matter?

    Meanwhile, I have been waxing prosaic on my year as a hyperfiction and
    hypertext author. I notice definitive changes in how I write, which is to
    say also, how I think (planning and process). And, I have become
    increasingly more visual in my work to the point that I am now drawing,
    which is to say I am "seeing" things in new ways.

    I am fascinated by what I see happening within my artistic being. Also ---
    being a hyperstory author makes me a better print writer, I am discovering.
    This is an angle I intend to explore further. I want to determine "how" and
    "why" this happened.

    The other important component -- reading or wreading -- depending on the
    theory (ies) in which one believes -- is also altered, I have discovered.
    One example: forcing myself to screen read rather than to print hard copies
    was a real test of wills, a real breaking of old, comfortable habits. I
    still love the printed word, but I have become increasingly more
    comfortable with screen reading. I am able to read for entertainment and
    for critical analysis whereas before I found screen reading for
    entertainment to be an absolute trial.

    Sincerely,
    Christine Goldbeck
    www.christinegoldbeck.com

    >
    > From: "Humanist Discussion Group (by way of Willard McCarty
    > <willard.mccarty@kcl.ac.uk>)"
    <willard@LISTS.VILLAGE.VIRGINIA.EDU>
    > Date: 2004/03/31 Wed AM 01:25:52 EST
    > To: humanist@Princeton.EDU
    > languages?
    >
    > Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 17, No. 752.
    > Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
    > www.kcl.ac.uk/humanities/cch/humanist/
    > www.princeton.edu/humanist/
    > Submit to: humanist@princeton.edu
    >
    > [1] From: Cristina Varisco <krissy_var@YAHOO.IT> (12)
    > Subject: e-learning for German language
    >
    > [2] From: Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty@kcl.ac.uk> (24)
    > Subject: doing the ethnography
    >
    > [3] From: "Yuri Tambovtsev" <yutamb@mail.cis.ru> (15)
    > Subject: Sonarant consonant tendencies in Turkic languages
    >
    >
    > --[1]------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:07:52 +0100
    > From: Cristina Varisco <krissy_var@YAHOO.IT>
    > Subject: e-learning for German language
    >
    > I am a graduating student and I am looking for e-learning used for the
    > "learning" and teaching of the German language. I know that it is more
    > likely to find the English language, but I thought you can help me in
    > finding something.
    > I will then examin the software used to make it. My "thesis paper" is about
    > computer linguistic, that's is why I subscribed to "Humanist".
    > Thank you
    >
    > Cristina Varisco
    > <mailto:krissy_var@yahoo.it>krissy_var@yahoo.it
    >
    >
    > --[2]------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:11:35 +0100
    > From: Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty@kcl.ac.uk>
    > Subject: doing the ethnography
    >
    > In the application of computing to research in the humanities, it is often
    > said that minds change as a result. After all the silt, twigs, sand and
    > pebbles of the dawn-of-a-new-consciousness sort have been washed away,
    > nuggets of gold remain. Scholars whom one trusts attest to their minds
    > having been changed -- and not so much about computing in isolation as
    > about their own fields of study. Anyone who has done such research will not
    > find their statements at all difficult to believe. But one must move on
    > from belief, at least we must, to the details. So how is this done?
    >
    > It seems obvious to me that ethnographic studies need to be done of work in
    > collaborative humanities computing projects to get at the details of this
    > claimed and believed metanoia. *How* are minds changed? In what
    > *particulars*? What *exactly* tends to induce the change? Is this a
    > permanent flip, a phase in a flip-flop or the making of a new mind that
    > co-exists alongside the old one, creating a useful double vision? What are
    > we leaving behind, making obscure by passing over the cognitive digital
    > threshold? And so on.
    >
    > Comments?
    >
    > Yours,
    > WM
    >
    >
    > [Note: If you do not receive a reply within 24 hours please
    > resend.]
    > Dr Willard McCarty | Senior Lecturer | Centre for Computing in the
    > Humanities | King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS || +44 (0)20
    > 7848-2784 fax: -2980 || willard.mccarty@kcl.ac.uk
    > www.kcl.ac.uk/humanities/cch/wlm/
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --[3]------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:11:59 +0100
    > From: "Yuri Tambovtsev" <yutamb@mail.cis.ru>
    > Subject: Sonarant consonant tendencies in Turkic languages
    >
    > Dear Humanist colleagues, I have computed several Turkic languages (among
    > them Tatar, Turkish, Turkmen, Bashkir, Jakut, Shor, Altaj-Kizhi, Azeri,
    > Tuvinian, etc.). I discovered that by the Chi-squire criterion the sonorant
    > consonants occur at the end of the word (Auslaut) more than at the
    > beginning of the word (Anlaut). It is usually several times greater. I
    > wonder if it is the same in other world languages? I mean if the tendency
    > of the greater occurence of sonorants at the end of the word is usual for
    > other language families. I plan to verify it on the texts of the
    > Tungus-Manchurian, Paleo-Asiatic, Indo-European, Finno-Ugric, Samoyedic and
    > Finno-Ugric language families. I am writing an article on the use of the
    > sonorant consonants at the beginning and end of the word in Turkic and the
    > other languages. please, advise me in what journal I may get it published.
    > Looking to hearing from you to
    > <mailto:yutamb@hotmail.com>yutamb@hotmail.com Remain yours sincerely Yuri
    > Tambovtsev <mailto:yutamb@hotmail.com>yutamb@hotmail.com
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri May 07 2004 - 16:58:01 EDT