17.079 anti-spamming software

From: Humanist Discussion Group (by way of Willard McCarty willard.mccarty@kcl.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Jun 11 2003 - 02:12:25 EDT

  • Next message: Humanist Discussion Group (by way of Willard McCarty

                    Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 17, No. 79.
           Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                         Submit to: humanist@princeton.edu

             Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 07:10:12 +0100
             From: "Jessica P. Hekman" <jphekman@arborius.net>
             Subject: Re: 17.068 anti-spamming software?

    On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Humanist Discussion Group (by way of Willard McCarty
    <willard.mccarty@kcl.ac.uk>) wrote:

    > Are there other anti-spamming devices we should all know about?

    I feel like maybe I already mentioned this on this list, but just in case
    -- I use TMDA (http://tmda.net/). It's a whitelist system (mail is
    disallowed by default, allowed only if the address is in your whitelist).
    You can do one of several things with the mail from someone not on your
    whitelist, but the interesting feature of TMDA is the ability to send the
    person a confirmation request: "answer this email and I'll believe you're
    not a spammer, and your original mail will be released to Jessica." The
    idea is that spammers don't generally send from legitimate email
    addresses, so a confirmation request will be ignored. Real people have a
    chance to say they're legit, and their mail gets through. I skim the list
    of messages which didn't get confirmed daily, and I do find some people
    who fail to answer the confirmation message; I release their message
    myself at that time.

    The downside is that some people find confirmation messages annoying. I
    sympathize with this, but TMDA is still the best answer to spam I've seen


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jun 11 2003 - 02:21:54 EDT