Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 14, No. 42.
Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
<http://www.princeton.edu/~mccarty/humanist/>
<http://www.kcl.ac.uk/humanities/cch/humanist/>
[1] From: viscom@parma.org (Director of Communications, (5)
Eparchy of Parma)
Subject: Lorem ipsum
[2] From: "Osher Doctorow" <osher@ix.netcom.com> (6)
Subject: Re: 14.0036 applause for argumenta ad risum
--[1]------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 06:12:48 +0100
From: viscom@parma.org (Director of Communications, Eparchy of Parma)
Subject: Lorem ipsum
[This apparently in response to a very old question. --WM]
Looks as though this site has the answer to your question.
http://www.neosplice.com/~ailanto/lorem.htm
Director of communications
viscom@parma.org
--[2]------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 06:13:34 +0100
From: "Osher Doctorow" <osher@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: 14.0036 applause for argumenta ad risum
From: Osher Doctorow osher@ix.netcom.com, Sat. May 27, 2000, 7:05AM
Dear Colleagues:
Jim Marchand's list of fallacies is very useful. I would add "appeal to the
mainstream", "appeal to mainstream Peer Reviewers", "appeal to the Chair,"
among others.
Yours truly (as opposed to falsely, of course),
Osher
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 06:24:08 CUT