11.0545 history of disciplines?

Humanist Discussion Group (humanist@kcl.ac.uk)
Fri, 30 Jan 1998 15:58:16 +0000 (GMT)

Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 11, No. 545.
Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
<http://www.princeton.edu/~mccarty/humanist/>
<http://www.kcl.ac.uk/humanities/cch/humanist/>

Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 17:25:15 +0000
From: Willard McCarty <Willard.McCarty@kcl.ac.uk>
Subject: disciplines

Any references to articles or books touching on the history of academic
disciplines would be most welcome. I am specifically interested in the
socio-political as well as intellectual conditions under which the modern
academic disciplines were formed, e.g. English and anthropology. English, I
have heard, was the subject of debate at Oxford about a century ago. Have
there been any arguments e.g. for and against bibliography as a discipline?
What about art history, which must have been viewed by some as deeply
suspect because of its links to art-appreciation and simple collecting. I
would guess that similar suspicions would have been voiced about
anthropology and archaeology, which even today attracts amateurs, gifted and
otherwise. Are there any particularly notable cases in which a leading
scholar wrote a manifesto establishing the credibility of a new discipline?

Thanks for any leads.

Yours,
WM
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr. Willard McCarty, Senior Lecturer, King's College London
voice: +44 (0)171 873 2784 fax: +44 (0)171 873 5801
e-mail: Willard.McCarty@kcl.ac.uk
<http://www.kcl.ac.uk/humanities/cch/wlm/>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Humanist Discussion Group
Information at <http://www.kcl.ac.uk/humanities/cch/humanist/>
<http://www.princeton.edu/~mccarty/humanist/>
=========================================================================