7.0585 News: Museum Access; Philosophy ETexts; CHum in OED (3/88

Elaine Brennan (EDITORS@BROWNVM.BITNET)
Wed, 30 Mar 1994 22:26:02 EST

Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 7, No. 0585. Wednesday, 30 Mar 1994.


(1) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 94 09:48:08 PST (22 lines)
From: Paul Brians <BRIANS@WSUVM1>
Subject: Admission to most public museums in France free to teachers

(2) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 1994 12:31:50 -0700 (26 lines)
From: epalmer@UTAHCCA.BITNET
Subject: Philosophy Electronic texts: 3/ed. Announcement

(3) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 1994 13:59:29 -0600 (40 lines)
From: Mark Olsen <mark@TUNA.UCHICAGO.EDU>
Subject: CHum makes good, finally!!

(1) --------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 94 09:48:08 PST
From: Paul Brians <BRIANS@WSUVM1>
Subject: Admission to most public museums in France free to teachers


Maybe I'm the last person to learn this, but just maybe it may help some
others. It seems that many French museums do not charge admission to
teachers. Just show your faculty card, and--if requested--some
confirming ID like passport or driver's license, and you get "entree
gratuite." None of the museums where my wife and I used this technique
had any reference to it posted publically--your're just supposed to know
it. This rule applies only to state and city museums like the Louvre,
not to private museums like the Marmottan or the Musee du monde arabe.
Most of the time the deal is good only for general admission; you still
have to pay to see special exhibits (though at the Musee des arts
populaires in the Bois de Boulogne we got in free even to the special
exhibit). This makes bopping into the Louvre for a quick look at some
special part of the permanent collection very attractive--bypass the
long ticket lines and go straight to the ticket collectors at the
entrance.

Paul Brians, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-5020
(2) --------------------------------------------------------------34----
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 1994 12:31:50 -0700
From: epalmer@UTAHCCA.BITNET
Subject: Philosophy Electronic texts: 3/ed. Announcement


The third edition of the American Philosophical Association Guide to
Electronic texts in Philosophy (March 1994) is now available from the APA
gopher. To access the document, get to the gopher by typing "gopher
apa.oxy.edu" at your main system prompt. The guide can be found under the
"Books and journals" and "Electronic Texts" nested directories.

Please feel free to reproduce and distribute the guide in its entirety onto
other servers and onto paper. If you cannot access the guide through the
gopher, please make requests for copies via email to the electronic mail
address below.

Eric Palmer
epalmer@cc.utah.edu

After July 1994:
Philosophy, U. of Kentucky Philosophy, Allegheny College
Lexington, KY 40506-0027 USA Meadville, PA 16335-3902
(606) 257-7103 fax. 606 257-3286 (814) 332-3314



(3) --------------------------------------------------------------58----
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 1994 13:59:29 -0600
From: Mark Olsen <mark@TUNA.UCHICAGO.EDU>
Subject: CHum makes good, finally!!


Well, for all my moaning and complaining about the failure
of scholars to cite _Computers and the Humanities_, I must
stand corrected. John Price-Wilkins of U. Virginia notes
the following citation from the OED:

OED Entry Search

Term: lemmatization


Found: 1 match(es)


lemmatization

lemmatization le_ma't@ize+i-S@n. f. next + -ation. The action or process of
lemmatizing; an instance of this.

1967 Computers & Humanities II. 75 Method:... 3. Alphabetic sorting into
word forms with context. 4. Lemmatisation.

1971 A. J. Aitken in R. A. Wisbey Computer in Lit. & Ling. Res. 14 The
methods of lemmatization..so far mentioned necessitate informing the
computer explicitly of the destination in terms of head&dubh;word of
every single instance of each word which it has to treat.

1972 Computers & Humanities VI. 212 Not all lemmas could, of course,
be made to come out correctly from the computer... In fact, the
accomplished wrong lemmatizations are more notable than the missing
correct ones.


BIG TIME!!

Mark