4.1317 Copyright (2/61)
Elaine Brennan & Allen Renear (EDITORS@BROWNVM.BITNET)
Sat, 4 May 91 18:41:37 EDT
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 4, No. 1317. Saturday, 4 May 1991.
(1) Date: Wed, 01 May 91 08:37:58 MST (15 lines)
From: Skip <DUSKNOX@IDBSU>
Subject: Re: 4.1302 Copyright
(2) Date: Wed, 01 May 91 11:44:35 CST (46 lines)
From: "Robin C. Cover" <ZRCC1001@SMUVM1>
Subject: COPYRIGHT - BILL OF RIGHTS
(1) --------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 01 May 91 08:37:58 MST
From: Skip <DUSKNOX@IDBSU>
Subject: Re: 4.1302 Copyright (2/112)
Joel Goldfield makes a good suggestion; one that I would second and one
which I will gladly volunteer to support. It would help if our effort
had a sponsoring professional organization(s), but the sponsorship of
individual universities will do for a start. Remember the words of
Grace Hopper: it is easier to apologize than to ask permission. We
just do it and let the chips fall where they may (so to speak). The
technology moves faster than the law.
ELLIS 'SKIP' KNOX
Historian, Data Center Associate
Boise State University DUSKNOX@IDBSU.IDBSU.EDU
(2) --------------------------------------------------------------48----
Date: Wed, 01 May 91 11:44:35 CST
From: "Robin C. Cover" <ZRCC1001@SMUVM1>
Subject: COPYRIGHT - BILL OF RIGHTS
In a recent issue of Publishers Weekly, Joanne Tangorra summarizes an
article "A Bill of Rights for Electronic Citizens" (Frank Connolly, Steven
Gilbert, Peter Lyman). She says,
"They [the authors] contend that future decisions about intellectual
property rights in an electronic environment must take into account a
wider constituency than was previously the case. They advocate that
--in addition to publishers, information providers and Congress--
users, potential users, and the creators and producers of intellectual
products all take part in the decision-making process."
What a heretical idea. Could it be that not JUST publishers, commercial
purveyors and bureaucrats should determine the destiny of academic writing,
but that the scholars themselves as CREATORS and USERS of the intellectual
property might have some legitimate thoughts about fairness. . . ?
Sheesh. Does everyone see what this revolution is all about?
The article also talks about technological progress toward elaborate auditing
systems aimed at enforcing the (now unenforceable) Copyright Clearance Center
rules for protecting intellectual property and collecting revenues.
************************************************************************
* Dear User, *
* This concludes your session using the Networked Online Browser *
* owned and operated by RipOff Inc. We hope you enjoyed your stay. *
* Total login time: 15 minutes *
* We are obliged under the Copyright Clearance Act to bill you an *
* additional $13 for browsing the article "The Implementation..." *
* since five articles from this issue have previously been read *
* by library patrons at your institution. If your library would like *
* to subscribe to EDOPP, the price is just 237 dollars US annual. *
* Connect time (at $120/hr) . . . . . . . . . . . $30 *
* Browsing (Per article fees) . . . . . . . . . . .$ 8 *
* CCC fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$13 *
* Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$51 *
* $51 has been charged to your personal VISA account *
* Please call again. *
************************************************************************
Robin Cover