4.0585 Qs: MR Dictionaries; 17th c. Typography;... (4/64)
Elaine Brennan & Allen Renear (EDITORS@BROWNVM.BITNET)
Mon, 15 Oct 90 19:59:08 EDT
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 4, No. 0585. Monday, 15 Oct 1990.
(1) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 90 21:39 EST (23 lines)
From: "NANCY M. IDE (914) 437 5988" <IDE@VASSAR>
Subject: use of m-r dictionaries
(2) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 90 19:40 EDT (10 lines)
From: VERONIS@vassar.bitnet
Subject: Requete: textes francais et bilingues francais/anglais
(3) Date: 14 October 1990, 18:15:38 EST (13 lines)
From: FLANNAGA at OUACCVMB
Subject: Apostrophes in 17th c. Composition
(4) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 90 12:10:18 EDT (18 lines)
From: Revised List Processor (1.6e) <LISTSERV@BROWNVM.BITNET>
Subject: Tutors Teaching Writing
(1) --------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 90 21:39 EST
From: "NANCY M. IDE (914) 437 5988" <IDE@VASSAR>
Subject: use of m-r dictionaries
A recent survey of the top twenty requested items from the Oxford Text
Archive reveals that the biggest category of item requested is machine
readable dictionaries and other lexical materials, including
Oxford advanced learner's dictionary (expanded "Computer Usable" version)
Collins English dictionary
Oxford advanced learner's dictionary
Shorter Oxford dictionary (headwords only)
Oxford dictionary of current idiomatic English
English pronouncing dictionary
MRC Psycholinguistic database
To my knowledge, large-scale research on machine readable dictionaries is
limited to a few projects. What are all those others who have acquired
these dictionaries using them for?
Nancy Ide
(2) --------------------------------------------------------------18----
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 90 19:40 EDT
From: VERONIS@vassar.bitnet
Subject: Requete: textes francais et bilingues francais/anglais
Je suis a la recherche de textes francais contemporains (litteraires ou non),
et, ce qui est plus difficile, de textes bilingues francais/anglais,
c'est-a-dire de textes avec leur traduction.
Quelqu'un aurait-il une idee?
Merci!
(3) --------------------------------------------------------------18----
Date: 14 October 1990, 18:15:38 EST
From: FLANNAGA at OUACCVMB
Subject: [Apostrophes in 17th c. Composition --eds]
Query about c-17 compositors and apostrophes with italics. A weird
question for anyone on the list who can answer it. I have noticed that
the compositors who set *Paradise Lost* rarely, if ever, used
apostrophes with possessive nouns unless they happened to be setting
proper names in italics, proper names that happened to be in the
possessive. Does anyone who has messed around with early printing
methods or with setting their own books in hand-presses have any
explanation for this? The type face for the 1667 and 1674 editions was
a form of Garamond and the point size about ten. Thanks for any help.
Roy Flannagan
(4) --------------------------------------------------------------60----
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 90 12:10:18 EDT
From: Revised List Processor (1.6e) <LISTSERV@BROWNVM.BITNET>
Subject: Tutors Teaching Writing
Help:
We are interested in studying the advantages, if any, of tutors
helping to teach writing within learning center environments.
We are familiar with Irene Clark's article "Preparing Future Composition
Teachers in the Writing Center", and would be very interested in
additional related references. Especially research instruments or
insights into the empirical evidence available.
Any help would be appreciated.
Irv Cockriel EDRSR438@UMCVMB University of Missouri-Columbia
Bonnie Zelenak LCZEL@UMCVMB University of Missouri-Columbia