4.0578 Algorithms; Footnotes; Terminals (3/42)
Elaine Brennan & Allen Renear (EDITORS@BROWNVM.BITNET)
Wed, 10 Oct 90 16:32:04 EDT
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 4, No. 0578. Wednesday, 10 Oct 1990.
(1) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 90 11:18 GMT (9 lines)
From: Oxford Text Archive <ARCHIVE@vax.oxford.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: 4.0572 Texts: Queries; SGML; SED; etc.
(2) Date: Fri, 5 OCT 90 13:57:59 GMT (16 lines)
From: CATHERINE@VAX.OXFORD.AC.UK
Subject: wordperfect footnotes
(3) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 90 14:20 EDT (17 lines)
From: <HANSCHKA@HARTFORD>
Subject: real computers :-)
(1) --------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 90 11:18 GMT
From: Oxford Text Archive <ARCHIVE@vax.oxford.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: 4.0572 Texts: Queries; SGML; SED; etc.
Don Spaeth's algorithm will not work in the (far from uncommon) case
where one tagged element is found nested within another. For that, as
for most realistic programming, you need to be able to manipulate a
stack.
Lou
(2) --------------------------------------------------------------25----
Date: Fri, 5 OCT 90 13:57:59 GMT
From: CATHERINE@VAX.OXFORD.AC.UK
Subject: wordperfect footnotes
Having been away at the time of Bob Kraft's query about preserving Word
Perfect footnotes, I am not sure if his question has been fully answered.
Here at Oxford we have a macro that extracts the footnotes and inserts
consecutively numbered footnotes in their places. The footnotes appear
as the second document on the split screen, and can from their be edited
to wherever they are wanted, presumably at the end of the same document
or in a different document on their own. I am not sure how to transmit
this macro by e-mail, but if anyone is interested, I can either mail it
or tell them how to do it (it was written by Lyn Munro).
Catherine Griffin
Oxford University
(3) --------------------------------------------------------------22----
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 90 14:20 EDT
From: <HANSCHKA@HARTFORD>
Subject: real computers :-)
<grin, oooh boy....> VT100s are real? Yup, sure are; I've used one
often enough. VT220s are not that much different as far as I can tell.
The only problem with them is that the local version of Moria won't run
off of a 220. And 320s? A large screen TV met a Mac and had a one
night stand. Then the offspring of the union got nuked by a physics lab
experiment that got out of control.... To work properly, now, the
offspring of the offspring need special equipment. Like mouse pads.
And did anyone ever find a VT320 in a computer lab WITH a mouse pad?
Nahhhh. 320s are real terminals designed by David Lynch, and
manufactured in the Twilight Zone.
<that felt good. Now if only I had a 300-smiley sig. file to put here>
Ruth H - I don't like MacIntosh apples, either.:-)
(1) --------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 90 11:18 GMT
From: Oxford Text Archive <ARCHIVE@vax.oxford.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: 4.0572 Texts: Queries; SGML; SED; etc.
Don Spaeth's algorithm will not work in the (far from uncommon) case
where one tagged element is found nested within another. For that, as
for most realistic programming, you need to be able to manipulate a
stack.
Lou
(2) --------------------------------------------------------------25----
Date: Fri, 5 OCT 90 13:57:59 GMT
From: CATHERINE@VAX.OXFORD.AC.UK
Subject: wordperfect footnotes
Having been away at the time of Bob Kraft's query about preserving Word
Perfect footnotes, I am not sure if his question has been fully answered.
Here at Oxford we have a macro that extracts the footnotes and inserts
consecutively numbered footnotes in their places. The footnotes appear
as the second document on the split screen, and can from their be edited
to wherever they are wanted, presumably at the end of the same document
or in a different document on their own. I am not sure how to transmit
this macro by e-mail, but if anyone is interested, I can either mail it
or tell them how to do it (it was written by Lyn Munro).
Received: by BROWNVM (Mailer R2.07) id 8596; Wed, 10 Oct 90 16:32:33 EDT
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 90 16:32:04 EDT
From: Elaine Brennan & Allen Renear <EDITORS@BROWNVM>
Subject: 4.0578 Algorithms; Footnotes; Terminals (3/42)
To: Humanist Discussion <HUMANIST@BROWNVM>
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 4, No. 0578. Wednesday, 10 Oct 1990.
(1) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 90 11:18 GMT (9 lines)
From: Oxford Text Archive <ARCHIVE@vax.oxford.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: 4.0572 Texts: Queries; SGML; SED; etc.
(2) Date: Fri, 5 OCT 90 13:57:59 GMT (16 lines)
From: CATHERINE@VAX.OXFORD.AC.UK
Subject: wordperfect footnotes
(3) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 90 14:20 EDT (17 lines)
From: <HANSCHKA@HARTFORD>
Subject: real computers :-)
(1) --------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 90 11:18 GMT
From: Oxford Text Archive <ARCHIVE@vax.oxford.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: 4.0572 Texts: Queries; SGML; SED; etc.
Don Spaeth's algorithm will not work in the (far from uncommon) case
where one tagged element is found nested within another. For that, as
for most realistic programming, you need to be able to manipulate a
stack.
Lou
(2) --------------------------------------------------------------25----
Date: Fri, 5 OCT 90 13:57:59 GMT
From: CATHERINE@VAX.OXFORD.AC.UK
Subject: wordperfect footnotes
Having been away at the time of Bob Kraft's query about preserving Word
Perfect footnotes, I am not sure if his question has been fully answered.
Here at Oxford we have a macro that extracts the footnotes and inserts
consecutively numbered footnotes in their places. The footnotes appear
as the second document on the split screen, and can from their be edited
to wherever they are wanted, presumably at the end of the same document
or in a different document on their own. I am not sure how to transmit
this macro by e-mail, but if anyone is interested, I can either mail it
or tell them how to do it (it was written by Lyn Munro).
Catherine Griffin
Oxford University
(3) --------------------------------------------------------------22----
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 90 14:20 EDT
From: <HANSCHKA@HARTFORD>
Subject: real computers :-)
<grin, oooh boy....> VT100s are real? Yup, sure are; I've used one
often enough. VT220s are not that much different as far as I can tell.
The only problem with them is that the local version of Moria won't run
off of a 220. And 320s? A large screen TV met a Mac and had a one
night stand. Then the offspring of the union got nuked by a physics lab
experiment that got out of control.... To work properly, now, the
offspring of the offspring need special equipment. Like mouse pads.
And did anyone ever find a VT320 in a computer lab WITH a mouse pad?
Nahhhh. 320s are real terminals designed by David Lynch, and
manufactured in the Twilight Zone.
<that felt good. Now if only I had a 300-smiley sig. file to put here>
Ruth H - I don't like MacIntosh apples, either.:-)