3.510 computing PhDs get jobs (57)
Willard McCarty (MCCARTY@vm.epas.utoronto.ca)
Thu, 28 Sep 89 19:14:31 EDT
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 3, No. 510. Thursday, 28 Sep 1989.
(1) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 89 21:11:00 EDT (20 lines)
From: "Leslie Z. Morgan" <MORGAN@LOYVAX>
Subject: RE: 3.506 Ph.D.s (50)
(2) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 89 08:13:38 PLT (16 lines)
From: Paul Brians <HRC$04@WSUVM1>
Subject: Tenure for Computer Experts
(1) --------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 89 21:11:00 EDT
From: "Leslie Z. Morgan" <MORGAN@LOYVAX>
Subject: RE: 3.506 Ph.D.s (50)
I would like to answer the question about "are there jobs for people in
humanities (languages, in this specific case) and computing with a
resounding yes. Both I and a couple of colleagues here are working hard,
with the full support of the department, division and college to incorporate
computing into the undergraduate curriculum bit by bit. Admittedly, the
students already use the computer lab facilities for other courses; but
with new equipment, as well as a conventional language lab, and a two
year language requirement, we are getting plenty of business. I think
(from what I hear) that this is in general true of a number of colleges
(note, colleges, not universities) whose names I will not take in vain. Have
you been looking at the smaller colleges, if you are interested in continuing
with computing and language?
Leslie Morgan
Dept. of Foreign Langs.
Loyola College
Baltimore, MD 21210-2699 (MORGAN@LOYVAX)
(2) --------------------------------------------------------------24----
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 89 08:13:38 PLT
From: Paul Brians <HRC$04@WSUVM1>
Subject: Tenure for Computer Experts
Daniel Boyarin asks whether computer expertise can lead to tenure-track
hiring. Here in the English Department at Washington State University
we have just hired a composition/computer expert, largely on the basis
of her computer knowledge, to run our composition laboratory. What is
unusual about the position is that it IS tenure-track. The faculty has
agreed to consider research in computer-aided instruction and even
programming leading to useful applications in our field as the equivalent
of the sort of research we more often evaluate. This was a big step
for us, and I suspect, rather unusual.
It should be noted that ours has been--by and large--a rather stuffy
and traditional department, not prone to wild experimentation.