Looks really good. Now needs correction! (e.g. I dont think Defoe and Carroll
really belong in there). Is it OK to start editing the file?


In message <1192220366.15336.7.camel@odonned-eng06> daniel.odonnell@uleth.ca writes:
> Looks pretty good to me. Is it a recognised bibliographic style? It
> isn't anything I use, but it covers the bases.
> 
> -dan
> 
> On Fri, 2007-12-10 at 19:53 +0100, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> > I have done some more work on this; see 
> > http://tei.oucs.ox.ac.uk/P5/Guidelines-web-beta/en/html/BIB.html
> > 
> > if any of you have reason to think this formatting is wrong, speak now. 
> > I claim
> > I have finished that task.
> > 
> -- 
> Daniel Paul O'Donnell, PhD
> Chair, Text Encoding Initiative <http://www.tei-c.org/>
> Director, Digital Medievalist Project <http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/>
> Associate Professor and Chair of English
> University of Lethbridge
> Lethbridge AB T1K 3M4
> Vox: +1 403 329 2378
> Fax: +1 403 382-7191
> Homepage: http://people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council@lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council