In message <46D2B714.50901@oucs.ox.ac.uk> Sebastian Rahtz writes: > Lou Burnard wrote: > > If you dont have an image you shouldn't be using in my view. > I do have an image, though. It's just not available electronically. for "image", read "digital image" then. > > a is an object composed of *images*, NOT data about images (that > > belongs in the header) > where? can you give an example? you could have a listBibl containing bibls most places, and not necesarily in the Header. I think what you're trying to do is create a listBibl with rather specialised content. > > NOT data about objects (we mostly don't have a home for > > that). A contains data about an *image of a surface*, NOT data about > > the original surface. > I suggest that Joe in the street will find this sophistry as hard to > grasp as I do.... Then we have to try harder. It's not sophistry: it's surprisingly similar to the difference between e.g. and > > Regardless, I still think and would benefit from