[ICA-EGAD-RiC] RiC-O use of existing related ontologies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[CLAVAUD Florence (Archives nationales)]

Hi John,

We have listed several ontologies whose domains are related to RiC one, 
and/or whose design is interesting for our own work.
PROV-O is one of them, along with OAI-ORE, FOAF, the Organization 
Ontology, LODE, and others.
And course CIDOC-CRM, which can be considered in a way as an upper 
ontology, like DOLCE.

We most probably will not borrow any class or property from these 
existing domain ontologies.

We will rather build a domain ontology from the archival concepts and 
relations defined in RiC-CM (with a finer level of granularity of 
course), where any institution or person (mainly archivists, but also 
records managers, users...) can find what it/he/she needs for describing 
records and their contexts. Then we will align RiC-O to other ontologies 
when possible.

We can tell much more a few weeks later.

Best regards,

Florence Clavaud
EGAD member, RiC-O development lead

Document sans nom

Florence Clavaud

Conservateur en chef du patrimoine | Chief curator

Chargée de mission, responsable des référentiels documentaires | 
Authority records and Vocabularies project leader

Direction des fonds


Archives nationales

59 rue Guynemer

90001

93383 Pierrefitte-sur-Seine Cedex --- France

Téléphone : +33 (0)1 75 47 20 20

-------- Message original --------
Sujet: [ICA-EGAD-RiC] RiC-O use of existing related ontologies 
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
De : Machin, John <John.Machin at finance.gov.au>
Pour : ica-egad-ric at lists.village.Virginia.EDU 
<ica-egad-ric at lists.village.Virginia.EDU>
Date : Lundi 3 Octobre 2016 23:23:43
> UNCLASSIFIED
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about the development of the Records in Context ontology (RiC-O), I hope this is an acceptable medium for such questions.
>
> To what extent, if any, are existing ontologies with possible relevance to this topic being used in the preparation of the RiC-O?
> I ask because while it is good citizenship to reuse existing ontologies it can also present issues if it causes the new ontology to be a Frankenstein's monster of catachresis if the existing ontologies patterns and elements don't tessellate well.
>
> I'm interested particularly in the use/non-use of the W3C's Provenance Ontology (PROV-O) and the ontology representation of PREMIS 2.2.
> Any choice of upper/abstract ontology would also be very interesting.
>
> Regards,
>
> John Machin | Information Architect - Records Interoperability Framework
> Efficiency, Assurance and Digital Government
> Government Business Transformation | Governance & APS Transformation
> Department of Finance
> T: 02 6215 1929 | M: 0424 531 001
> E: john.machin at finance.gov.au
> A: One Canberra Avenue, Forrest, ACT 2603
>
> UNCLASSIFIED
>
> ________________________________
>
> Finance Australian Business Number (ABN):   61 970 632 495
> Finance Web Site:   www.finance.gov.au
>
> IMPORTANT:
>
> This transmission is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone on 61-2-6215-2222 and delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments.
> If responding to this email, please send to the appropriate person using the suffix .gov.au.
>
> ________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> ICA-EGAD-RiC mailing list
> ICA-EGAD-RiC at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/ica-egad-ric

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Merci de nous aider à préserver l'environnement en n'imprimant ce courriel et les documents joints que si nécessaire.